Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL Analogues Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft (PCaX) Mouse Models

Tim Phelps, Jyoti Roy, Falguni Basuli, Xiang Zhang, Margaret White, Karen Wong, Anita Ton, Carolyn Woodroofe, Rolf Swenson, Peter Choyke and Elaine Jagoda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 343;
Tim Phelps
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jyoti Roy
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Falguni Basuli
3Imaging Probe Development Center National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiang Zhang
3Imaging Probe Development Center National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret White
1Laboratory of Genitourinary Cancer Pathogenesis National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Wong
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Ton
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn Woodroofe
3Imaging Probe Development Center National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rolf Swenson
3Imaging Probe Development Center National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Choyke
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Jagoda
2Molecular Imaging Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

343

Objectives: PSMA is highly expressed on prostate cancers and is an attractive biomarker for targeted imaging and therapy using small molecules containing the PSMA inhibitor lysine-urea-glutamate binding motif. A PET imaging agent, [18F]DCFPyL (1), clinically used for targeting PSMA demonstrates high affinity and specificity for PSMA resulting in quality image resolution. However, [18F]DCFPyL accumulates and is retained in the kidneys, which makes detection of PSMA lesions near the kidneys challenging. Further, the kidneys become the dose limiting organ for radiotherapy. Recently, a [18F]DCFPyL analogue, [18F]AcBz (2), demonstrated improved PSMA targeting but slower kidney clearance compared to 1, thus has inspired the development of other [18F]DCFPyL analogues [1]. Herein, novel oxime-linked fluorine-18 radiolabeled analogues ([18F]HexBz (3), [18F]AcPy (4), and [18F]HexPy (5)) were developed and compared in vitro and in vivo using PC3-PSMA+ PCaX tumor mouse models to potentially improve kidney clearance and tumor targeting.

Methods: Fluorine-18 radiolabeled DCFPyL (1), 4-[18F]fluorobenzaldehyde and 6-[18F]fluoronicotinaldehyde were prepared following published methods [2, 3, 4]. Oxime formation of aminooxy functionalized PSMA-inhibitor lysine-urea-glutamate scaffold with fluorine-18 labeled aldehydes produced radiotracers 2-5 (Fig. 1), which were purified by HPLC and had radiochemical yields between 25-40% (n > 10, uncorrected) within 50-60 min. In vitro saturation and competition binding studies of 1-5­ were performed using PC3-PSMA+ cells to evaluate affinity (Kd; Ki). In vivo biodistribution studies of 1-5 were performed using PC3-PSMA+ PCaX mice at 1 h post injection (p.i.) for positive (radiotracer only) or blocking (radiotracer with 1000x concentration of non-radioactive DCFPyL) groups, from which % injected doses per gram of tissue (% ID/g) were determined. PET/CT imaging studies were collected at 1 h p.i. using the same PCaX model. Thin-layer-chromatography (TLC) was performed with serum samples 1 h p.i. to evaluate the percent intact radiotracer (% parent).

Results: Kd and Ki values of 1 (0.23-0.32 nM) were similar within 2 fold of 2-4 (0.10-0.31 nM) while 5 (0.7-0.9 nM) was 3 fold higher than 1. Biodistribution of 1-5 at 1 h p.i. demonstrated tumor uptakes ranging from 15-28% ID/g which were 57-91% blocked (1.5-12% ID/g). Tissue-to-blood (T:B) and tissue-to-muscle (T:M) ratios revealed similar tumor blocking ranging from 59-83% for 1, 3, and 5, however less blocking was observed for 2 (28-42%) and 4 (16-26%). Kidney uptake ranged from 144-153% ID/g for all compounds except 3, which was reduced by ~40% (~90% ID/g). Increased liver uptake was observed for 2 (10-11% ID/g), 3 (8-9% ID/g) and 5 (18-20% ID/g) compared to 1 (2% ID/g) and 4 (3% ID/g) which were 3 to 10 fold lower. Serum TLC results (% parent) demonstrated in vivo stability was enhanced for 3 (73 ± 3%) and 5 (74 ± 2%) compared to 1 (43 ± 6%). Bone uptake of 2-4­ were comparable to 1 whereas 5 was higher suggesting 1-4 have less in vivo defluorination. PET/CT imaging studies of compounds 1-5 confirmed the biodistribution results and tumors were easily visualized.

Conclusions: PSMA inhibitor compounds 1-5 demonstrated suitable in vitro affinity and in vivo tumor uptake for imaging. Compounds 2 and 4, with higher T:M and T:B ratios and similar PSMA retention compared to 1, may be more desirable imaging agents that are capable of detecting PSMA at lower concentrations. Compound 3 may serve as a better radiotherapeutic agent sparing dose to the kidneys without jeopardizing tumor uptake. References: [1] Bouvet V, Wuest M, Bailey JJ et al. Mol Imaging Biol 2017;19:923-932. [2] Basuli F, Zhang X, Woodroofe CC et al. J Label Compd Radiopharm 2017;60:168-175. [3] Basuli F, Zhang X, Jagoda EM et al. J Label Compd Radiopharm 2018;61:599-605. [4] Bouvet V, Wuest M, Jans H et al. EJNMMI Research 2016;6:40.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL Analogues Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft (PCaX) Mouse Models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL Analogues Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft (PCaX) Mouse Models
Tim Phelps, Jyoti Roy, Falguni Basuli, Xiang Zhang, Margaret White, Karen Wong, Anita Ton, Carolyn Woodroofe, Rolf Swenson, Peter Choyke, Elaine Jagoda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 343;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL Analogues Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft (PCaX) Mouse Models
Tim Phelps, Jyoti Roy, Falguni Basuli, Xiang Zhang, Margaret White, Karen Wong, Anita Ton, Carolyn Woodroofe, Rolf Swenson, Peter Choyke, Elaine Jagoda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 343;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

  • A general 11C-carboxylation approach mediated by fluoride-desilylation of organosilanes
  • Relationships between tau, atrophy, regional brain activity and connectivity in Alzheimer's disease: a PET/MRI multimodal study
  • Gray matter structural networks related to 18F-THK5351 retention in cognitively normal older adults and early Alzheimer’s disease patients
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Novel Radiochemistry for Cancer Applications

  • First-in-human study of a novel somatostatin receptor antagonist 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 for molecular imaging of paraganglioma patients
  • Yttrium-86 PET imaging in rodents to better understand the biodistribution and clearance of gadolinium-based contrast agents used in MRI.
Show more Novel Radiochemistry for Cancer Applications

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire