Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTech Students

Assaying Lutetium 177 in a Dose Calibrator

Momitul Talukdar, Heather Dewhirst and Andrew Paulsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2080;
Momitul Talukdar
2Nuclear Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Health Sciences Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Dewhirst
2Nuclear Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Health Sciences Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Paulsen
1Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2080

Background: The use of Lutetium 177 (Lu 177), a beta emitter, as a therapeutic radionuclide is growing. Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate (Lutathera®) is a new Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy (PRRT) recently approved by the FDA for neuroendocrine tumors. When assaying beta emitters in a dose calibrator, there may be production of low electromagnetic energies due to direct decay properties or via Bremsstrahlung. Container types and geometries can affect the dose calibrator assay of any radionuclide, especially those that produce low electromagnetic energy. Lu 177 emits high energy beta particles with an Eβ max = 497 keV (78.6 %), 384 keV (9.1 %) and 176 keV (12.2 %), and gamma photons Eγ = 208keV (11.1%), 113 keV (6.6%). There are also multiple low energy x-rays (65 keV or less), but emitted a small percent of time. The aim of this study is to understand the effects of container types and geometries during a Lu 177 assay. Materials/Methods: A CRC® dose calibrator was used to assay Lu 177. Multiple tests were performed to determine the effects of different container types, such as glass and plastic, on dose calibrator readings. The dose calibrator readings of a 5ml plastic syringe, 10ml plastic syringe, 12 ml plastic syringe, 20ml plastic syringe, and a small glass vial were compared to a large glass vial (Lutathera® vial). This was repeated two more times. Effects on geometry were determined by assaying Lu 177 in a 20ml plastic syringe and consecutively adding 3 ml of saline solution (0.9% NaCl). The starting total volume was 3 ml and the ending total volume was 15 ml. This was also repeated two more times.

Results: The percent differences between the large glass vial and the plastic syringes were: 5ml plastic syringe 4.61%, 10ml plastic syringe 1.67%, 12 ml plastic syringe 2.22%, and 20 ml plastic syringe 4.11%. The percent difference large glass vial and small glass vial was 0.03%. For geometry assessment, the average percent difference for all volumes was 0.75%. Conclusion: Results show that neither the container type nor geometry has a significant effect on dose calibrator readings when assaying Lu 177. The gamma photons at Eγ = 208keV (11.1%), 113 keV (6.6%) most likely contribute to the ionization in the dose calibrator and are not greatly affected by container type and geometry. Hence, one calibration number on the dose calibrator could be used to assay Lu 177. References: Dash, A., Raghavan Ambikalmajan Pillai, M., & Knapp Jr., F. (2015, February 17). Production of 177Lu for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Available Options. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4463871/pdf/13139_2014_Article_315.pdf

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assaying Lutetium 177 in a Dose Calibrator
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assaying Lutetium 177 in a Dose Calibrator
Momitul Talukdar, Heather Dewhirst, Andrew Paulsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2080;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assaying Lutetium 177 in a Dose Calibrator
Momitul Talukdar, Heather Dewhirst, Andrew Paulsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2080;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Choose Your Collimator Wisely: Inappropriate Collimator Selection During a 177Lu-DOTATATE Posttreatment Scan
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Tech Students

  • An examination of Dose Loss of Tc99m-MAA Due to Needle Cap Adsorption and Transportation
  • Interventional Radiology and the Dosimetry Conundrum
  • Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory Gated Magnetic Resonance-Based Attenuation Correction of PET/MR
Show more Tech Students

Technologist Student Papers III

  • An examination of Dose Loss of Tc99m-MAA Due to Needle Cap Adsorption and Transportation
  • Interventional Radiology and the Dosimetry Conundrum
  • Prevalence of coronary artery calcification in patients undergoing SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Show more Technologist Student Papers III

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire