Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTech Students

Comparison of GFR values from the commonly used Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to the 99mTc-DTPA modified Russell two-point method

Ashley Hacker, Tim Houston, Alyssa Wagner, Elizabeth De Puente, Keyla Reis, Michelle Gruchot and Gary Dillehay
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2043;
Ashley Hacker
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
3Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Houston
5Northwestern Memorial Hospital Orland Park IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alyssa Wagner
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
3Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth De Puente
4Northwestern Memorial Hospital Montgomery IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keyla Reis
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
3Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Gruchot
1Lockport IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Dillehay
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
3Northwestern Memorial Hospital Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2043

Objectives: Determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is commonly used in the assessment of kidney function. Accurate determination of GFR is necessary in several clinical situations including possible kidney donation, monitoring patients with chronic kidney disease, and calculating/adjusting doses of medications with a narrow therapeutic window. The objective of our study is to compare the GFR values calculated using two commonly used formulas: the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, to the 99mTc-DTPA modified Russell two-point values.

Methods: Northwestern Memorial Hospital uses the modified Russell two-point method with 99mTc-DTPA to routinely screen patients for potential kidney donation. This study consists of collecting blood samples at 60 and 180 minutes post injection and measuring the plasma clearance of ultra-filtered (protein free) samples to determine the GFR value. For each of the 35 patients in the study, GFR values were also calculated using both the CG formula, CLcr=(140-Age) [asterisk](Weight (Kg))/72(Crserum) ([asterisk]0.85 for females), as well as the CKD-EPI equation. The CKD-EPI equation is based on patient race, gender, age, and serum creatinine. All GFR values were normalized to 1.73 m2 by multiplying the GFR value by 1.73/BSA. The BSA was calculated according to Du Bois and Du Bois: BSA = (Body Weight (kg)0.425 [asterisk] Height (cm)0.725) [asterisk] 0.007184. In preparation for the study, all patients were instructed to hydrate by drinking 32 oz of clear liquid one hour prior to study, to avoid caffeine starting at 10:00 pm the night prior, and to follow a low-protein diet. No patients tested were <18 years of age or suspected of having compromised renal function.

Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1 and GFR results are shown in Table 2.

Conclusions: When evaluating patients for potential kidney donation, accurate assessment of renal function is critical. Based on the study, estimated GFR values using both the CG and CKD-EPI formulas were much lower than those determined from the modified Russell two-point method (-25.6% and -36.1% respectively).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of GFR values from the commonly used Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to the 99mTc-DTPA modified Russell two-point method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of GFR values from the commonly used Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to the 99mTc-DTPA modified Russell two-point method
Ashley Hacker, Tim Houston, Alyssa Wagner, Elizabeth De Puente, Keyla Reis, Michelle Gruchot, Gary Dillehay
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2043;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of GFR values from the commonly used Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations to the 99mTc-DTPA modified Russell two-point method
Ashley Hacker, Tim Houston, Alyssa Wagner, Elizabeth De Puente, Keyla Reis, Michelle Gruchot, Gary Dillehay
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2043;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Tech Students

  • An examination of Dose Loss of Tc99m-MAA Due to Needle Cap Adsorption and Transportation
  • Interventional Radiology and the Dosimetry Conundrum
  • Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory Gated Magnetic Resonance-Based Attenuation Correction of PET/MR
Show more Tech Students

Technologist Student Papers I

  • Reduced counts during a simulated extrinsic uniformity on a SPECT gamma camera.
  • Effect of instant oatmeal reconstitution methods on gastric emptying results
  • Added Value of SPECT/CT in Post Lu-177 Dotatate Treatment for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Technologist Student Papers I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire