Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTech Students

Ga-68 Dotatoc versus In-111 Ocreotide.

Amanda Coffey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2038;
Amanda Coffey
1Molloy College Massapequa NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2038

Aim: This abstract aims to evaluate whether Ga-68 dotatoc is, in fact, a more comprehensive and accurate study for detecting neuroendocrine tumors versus the more familiar method, In-111 octreotide scan. Both radiopharmaceuticals are used to localize, diagnose, and follow patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). NETs are rare tumors found in neuroendocrine cells that can spread throughout the body. If caught in the early stages, NETs may be curable. Overall survival rate usually varies depending on the stage or grade. Ga-68 dotatoc localizes in tumors by receptor binding. It has a half-life of just 68 minutes with an energy of 511 KeV. The typical dose is 4-6 mCi. IV with uptake of approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour. The patient is positioned supine, head first, and imaged skull base to thigh. Ga-68 dotatoc is an extremely useful radiopharmaceutical because of the rapid isotope localization, quick scanning time of 20-25 minutes, and the short half-life. In-111 octreotide has a half-life of 67 hours and an energy of 171 KeV and 245 KeV. The recommended dose of In-111 octreotide is approximately 6 mCi IV. The patient returns 4 hours later for imaging. The first set of whole-body images take approximately 20 - 30 minutes. After these images are acquired, SPECT imaging is often required which takes an additional 20 - 30 minutes. The patient returns in 24 hours for the same set of pictures including SPECT. If high intestinal activity is detected on the first set of images, the patient may be asked to take a mild laxative before they go to bed to reduce interfering activity on the 24-hour images. If high background persists, the patient may need to return for 48-hour imaging and SPECT. Ga-68 dotatoc has many advantages over In-111 octreotide imaging. Ga-68 dotatoc is extremely quick because the patient is injected and imaged within an hour. The complete test is over within 2 hours. With In-111octreotide, localization of the radioisotope is slow, multiple images must be acquired up to 24 and even 48 hours, delaying time to final results and diagnosis. A disadvantage of Ga-68 dotatoc is that it is more expensive. Both Ga-68 dotatoc and In-111 octreotide imaging are clinically useful for detecting neuroendocrine tumors. However, Ga-68-dotatoc, as PET tracer, has been shown to be more accurate with higher sensitivity (96% vs. 86%) and specificity (93% vs 50%) than In-111 octreotide. Subject 1: 57-year-old patient with ileal carcinoid, status post-surgery, radiation therapy for metastases in the breast and left femur, rising serotonin.References: (For Picture) Graham MM, Gu X, Ginader T, Breheny P, Sunderland JJ. 68Ga-DOTATOC Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. 2017;58(9):1452-1458.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ga-68 Dotatoc versus In-111 Ocreotide.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Ga-68 Dotatoc versus In-111 Ocreotide.
Amanda Coffey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2038;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ga-68 Dotatoc versus In-111 Ocreotide.
Amanda Coffey
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2038;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Tech Students

  • An examination of Dose Loss of Tc99m-MAA Due to Needle Cap Adsorption and Transportation
  • Interventional Radiology and the Dosimetry Conundrum
  • Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory Gated Magnetic Resonance-Based Attenuation Correction of PET/MR
Show more Tech Students

Technologist Student Papers I

  • Reduced counts during a simulated extrinsic uniformity on a SPECT gamma camera.
  • Effect of instant oatmeal reconstitution methods on gastric emptying results
  • Added Value of SPECT/CT in Post Lu-177 Dotatate Treatment for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Technologist Student Papers I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire