Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologists

Comparison of Patient Experience with Commercial Versus Compounded Amino Acid Infusion for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy

Erika Padilla-Morales, Adela Tan, Thomas Hope and Emily Bergsland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2015;
Erika Padilla-Morales
3Radiology -- Nuclear Medicine University of San Francisco San Francisco CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adela Tan
3Radiology -- Nuclear Medicine University of San Francisco San Francisco CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Hope
2University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Bergsland
1San Francisco CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2015

Objectives: A variety of medications are given to 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy patients as a preventative measure to alleviate nausea and protect kidney function during therapy sessions. Amino acid infusions containing the charged amino acids lysine and arginine are used during administration to protect kidney function. These amino acids can cause significant nausea in patients, which are often treated with anti-emetics. In the United States, the FDA approved amino acids formulations (commercial) contain a large number of amino acids in addition to lysine and arginine and this can result in high rates of nausea. Compounded amino acids that contain only lysine and arginine must be made by a compounding pharmacy but potentially result in significantly less nausea.

Methods: Data was compiled and reviewed for patients that received commercial (Clinisol II) and compounded amino acid infusion protocols within the medical center. Analysis between the two amino acid protocols was then done regarding the following: 1) duration of infusion; 2) reported frequency of nausea; 3) reported administration of medications including Zofran (Ondansetron Hcl), Ativan (lorazepam), Emend (aprepitant), and Phenergan (promethazine). 18 patients who received 36 number of treatments over six months were reviewed. 14 treatments were performed using the commercial amino acids and 22 treatments were performed after the introduction of compounded amino acids.

Results: Analysis revealed the following between the commercial acid protocol and the compounded amino acid protocol: 1) duration of administration was reduced for patients receiving the compounded amino acid protocol (263 minutes versus 379 minutes; p < 0.001); 2) reports of nausea was reduced for patients receiving compounded amino acid protocol (5% of compounded amino acid patients versus 71% of commercial amino acid patients); 3) administration of Zofran was needed less frequently for patients receiving compounded amino acid protocol (41% versus 86% of commercial amino acid patients); 4) administration of Ativan, Emend, and Phenergan was not used in patients receiving compounded amino acids versus 86% of the patients receiving commercial amino acids (71% Ativan, 100% Emend, and 92% Phenergan, respectively).

Conclusions: Overall patient experience is markedly improved with compounded amino acids in comparison with commercially available products. Patient side-effects during treatment are greatly reduced, resulting in fewer antiemetics used and an overall reduction in infusion times.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Patient Experience with Commercial Versus Compounded Amino Acid Infusion for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Patient Experience with Commercial Versus Compounded Amino Acid Infusion for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy
Erika Padilla-Morales, Adela Tan, Thomas Hope, Emily Bergsland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2015;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Patient Experience with Commercial Versus Compounded Amino Acid Infusion for 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy
Erika Padilla-Morales, Adela Tan, Thomas Hope, Emily Bergsland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 2015;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologists

  • Effect of scattering correction on SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging
  • Monte Carlo simulation of the acquisition conditions for 177Lu molecular imaging of hepatic tumors
Show more Technologists

Tech Papers III: Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

  • Returning to work after I-131 treatment: A Nuclear Medicine Technologist’s Personal Experience
  • Imaging Evaluation of Multi-type Neuropeptide Y(NPY) Derivative for Breast Tumor Therapy
Show more Tech Papers III: Diagnostic & Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire