Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Characterization of uptake and absorbed doses to tumor and normal liver between 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-microspheres in 90Y-radioembolization

Srinivas Kappadath, Ahmed Kaseb, Mohamed Abdelsalam and Armeen Mahvash
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1633;
Srinivas Kappadath
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmed Kaseb
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed Abdelsalam
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armeen Mahvash
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1633

Objectives: 90Y-microspheres Radioembolization (90Y-RE) with is an emerging form of radiotherapy in the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that requires precise delivery of radiation to planned treatment volumes to ensure efficacy. We characterized the differences in uptake and absorbed doses to tumor and normal liver within the treated liver (NL) between planned (99mTc-MAA) and delivered (90Y-glass microspheres) treatments for HCC patients.

Methods: We performed retrospective dosimetry analysis of a single arm, single-institution phase II study of sorafenib followed by 90Y-RE in advanced HCC patients (n=34). 90Y-RE treatment planning was done per the package insert - prescribing a mean nominal absorbed dose (120 Gy) to treated liver volume (containing tumors and NL) using 1-compartment MIRD model. Quantitative 99mTc-MAA and 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT’s, acquired as standard-of-care, were input into MIM 90Y-SurePlan software to compute planned and delivered voxel-level dose distributions, respectively. Treated liver volumes and tumors (D>2.5cm; &#8804;3 per patient; n=53) were segmented by an interventional radiologist using diagnostic CT/MRI of the liver registered to 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT. All tumors with 1 cm<D<2.5 cm were segmented and included as non-target tumors. 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT was registered to the corresponding 90Y SPECT/CT; the tumor/liver contours were auto-transferred and manually adjusted. Planned and delivered mean doses to tumors and NL were computed. The tumor to NL uptake ratio (TNR) was calculated for all patients. Summary statistics and linear correlation (r) analysis were performed. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (95%CI) between planned and delivered dose estimates.

Results: While population-median (range) of treated liver dose was similar between planned 120 (85-145) Gy and delivered 116.5 (84-140) Gy doses; patient-specific tumor and NL compartments showed large differences. The TNR were correlated (r=0.55, p<0.001) with similar median (range) of 2.5 (0.3-8.4) and 2.1 (0.7-6.9) in planned and delivered images. However, paired differences between planned and delivered TNR showed a wide 95%CI range of -3.0 to 4.0. In 14/34 (41%) cases the delivered TNR was within 0.5 of planned (or equivalent); but in 15/34 (44%) cases the TNR differences were >1.0 (or discordant). Mean tumor doses were well correlated (r=0.76, p<0.001) but population-median (range) delivered dose 165 (40-764) Gy was ~40% lower than planned dose 231 (9-627) Gy. Furthermore, paired difference between planned and delivered tumors doses were large with mean absolute and fractional differences (95%CI) of 91 (-145 to 226) Gy and 48% (-142% to 238%). Only in 18/53 (34%) cases were tumor doses delivered within 20% of planned doses (or equivalent); while in 10/53 (19%) cases tumor doses delivered were <20% of planned doses (or under-treated). The mean dose to NL were well correlated (r=0.69, p<0.001) with similar population-median (range) planned 87 (20-117) Gy and delivered 89 (21-136) Gy doses. However, paired differences between planned and delivered NL doses were found to have wide 95%CI range for absolute and fractional 95%CI differences of -41 to 35 Gy and -55% to 49%. Only in 22/34 (65%) cases were the absolute difference between planned and delivered NL doses found to be <20% (or equivalent); while in 12/34 (35%) cases the differences were found to be >20% (or discordant).

Conclusions: Patient-specific tumor and NL compartments showed large differences due to alterations in distribution and variations in TNR between MAA and Y90; therefore MAA-based planning doses are not reliable to estimate tumor response or NL toxicities. Post therapy imaging with PET or SPECT is essential for dosimetry and response assessment. Analysis of planned and delivered dose correlations with tumor response and toxicities are underway.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of uptake and absorbed doses to tumor and normal liver between 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-microspheres in 90Y-radioembolization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Characterization of uptake and absorbed doses to tumor and normal liver between 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-microspheres in 90Y-radioembolization
Srinivas Kappadath, Ahmed Kaseb, Mohamed Abdelsalam, Armeen Mahvash
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1633;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Characterization of uptake and absorbed doses to tumor and normal liver between 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-microspheres in 90Y-radioembolization
Srinivas Kappadath, Ahmed Kaseb, Mohamed Abdelsalam, Armeen Mahvash
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1633;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

  • Assessment of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) availability and neuronal response to rewarding food-cues in human obesity using simultaneous PET-MRI
  • Bridging brain structural/functional connectivity and tau load in PSP: A [18F]PI-2620 PET/MRI study
  • MACROPA highly stable chelator of Radium-223 and functionalization attempts for targeted treatment of cancer
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Dosimetry Posters

  • Multi SPECT/CT-based patient specific lesion and kidney dosimetry for verification of simpler approaches for treatment planning in Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT
  • Are there differences in the DNA double-strand break induction in blood leukocytes of prostate cancer patients during Ga-68-PSMA diagnostics and Lu-177-PSMA therapy?
  • Preclinical dosimetry and human biodistribution of 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-rhPSMA-7.3
Show more Dosimetry Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire