Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEducational Exhibits

How to interpret and report 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Standard Uptake Value (SUV) measurement? Pearls and pitfalls

Faraz Farhadi, Babak Saboury and Elizabeth Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1150;
Faraz Farhadi
2National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Babak Saboury
3University of Maryland Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Jones
1Bethesda MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1150

Introduction: The purpose of this educational exhibit is to shed light on clinical interpretation of the measured SUV in 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT imaging. As of June 1st 2016, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is approved by the FDA as the imaging standard of reference for management of the well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), providing greater accuracy in disease detection and characterization when compared with conventional imaging modalities. Qualitative evaluation of images plays a pivotal role in diagnosis and management of these patients, as reflected on SSTR-RADS Version 1.0 (Reporting System for SSTR PET). However, the clinical application of the conventional semi-quantitative measure (SUV) is controversial. The rationale for 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is based on higher expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in NETs comparing to the other cells. Binding of radio-ligand (rL) to SSTR and subsequent internalization of the rL-SSTR complex result in accumulation of tracer within the cells. The measured SUV is the result of these complex interactions during the time between the injection of the tracer and imaging; the measured activity is the function of SSTR density (SSTR expression level per cell and concentration of the viable NET cells) as well as the other contributing factors including rL-SSTR binding potential, rates of internalization of rL-SSTR, and perfusion rate of the tracer. The variable rate of internalization and dissociation between receptor expression and internalization, in addition to the other confounding factors, significantly affect the measured SUV. How to convey the meaning of measured SUV to clinicians? We will address this by reviewing the literature systematically; the following concepts will be discussed: 1. Principles of SSTR expression and biology in NETs: a. modeling of receptor binding and internalization. b. receptor expression regulation. c. dynamic interaction of Somatostatin Analogs (SSA) with SSTR. 2. Basics of 68Ga-SSA PET/CT imaging and SUV measurement, including the effect of competitive inhibition in patients undergoing somatostatin analog therapy. 3. Beyond the basics: Anatomy of 68Ga-SSA SUV: a. What is the net uptake rate (Ki) and does SUV properly resemble receptor expression and different receptor density levels? b. How to model 68Ga-SSA kinetic? c. What is the impact of tumor burden on SUV? d. Can we use SUV for treatment planning? e. What is the prognostic value of pre-treatment SUV and total tumor tracer uptake quantification? f. Can we use SUV to evaluate treatment response, as we do with 18F-FDG PET/CT SUV? 4. Take Home message: What clinicians should know about SUV measurement when interpret and report 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to interpret and report 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Standard Uptake Value (SUV) measurement? Pearls and pitfalls
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
How to interpret and report 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Standard Uptake Value (SUV) measurement? Pearls and pitfalls
Faraz Farhadi, Babak Saboury, Elizabeth Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1150;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How to interpret and report 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT Standard Uptake Value (SUV) measurement? Pearls and pitfalls
Faraz Farhadi, Babak Saboury, Elizabeth Jones
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 1150;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Educational Exhibits

  • Do They Work? Utilizing the "Hoshin Kanri" Process in the Nuclear Medicine Department
  • Challenges in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Benign Osseous Hypermetabolic Lesions
  • Early small bowel activity may predict rapid gastric transit on gastric emptying scintigraphy
Show more Educational Exhibits

Educational Exhibit Posters

  • Challenges in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Benign Osseous Hypermetabolic Lesions
  • Do They Work? Utilizing the "Hoshin Kanri" Process in the Nuclear Medicine Department
  • Early small bowel activity may predict rapid gastric transit on gastric emptying scintigraphy
Show more Educational Exhibit Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire