Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular Track

Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with multifocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, Planar Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau, Vincent Finnerty, Stephanie Tan, Sebastien Authier, Jean Gregoire and Francois Harel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 511;
Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Finnerty
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Tan
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastien Authier
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Gregoire
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francois Harel
1Montreal Heart Institute Montreal QC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

511

Background: IQ-SPECT has been shown to significantly reduce acquisition time and administered dose while preserving image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging. The accuracy of gated blood-pool SPECT (GBPS) with IQ-SPECT to assess left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic volumes (LVEDV) remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare LVEF and LVEDV obtained with IQ-SPECT to planar ventriculography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Methods: Sixty consecutive patients who underwent IQ-SPECT GBPS and planar imaging were included. Among those patients, 11 also underwent cMRI within 30 days of their GBPS. IQ-SPECT LVEF and LVEDV were calculated automatically using 2 validated software: QBS and MHI (Harel et al, 2007, 2010). IQ-SPECT LVEF measurements were compared to planar LVEF and cMRI LVEF. IQ-SPECT LVEDV measurements were compared to cMRI LVEDV.

Results: Average ± SD planar LVEF was 48 ± 11 % (range 23 to 70 %) and average GBPS LVEDV was 177 ± 59mL (range 63 to 342 mL). Average ± SD GBPS LVEF were 40 ± 12 % and 44 ± 12 % with QBS and MHI respectively. Correlation coefficients between IQ-SPECT and planar LVEF were r=0.70 and r=0.83 for QBS and MHI respectively. Correlation coefficient between cMRI and planar LVEF was 0.69. Correlation coefficients between cMRI and GBPS LVEF were 0.52 and 0.65 using QBS and MHI respectively. Correlation coefficient between cMRI and GBPS LVEDV was 0.80 with both QBS and MHI. There was no significant correlation between the planar and GBPS LVEF difference versus LVEDV with QBS (r=0.03, p=0.81) and MHI (r=0.14, p=0.29).

Conclusions: : LVEF calculated with GBPS using IQ-SPECT correlates well with planar measurements for a broad range of LVEF and LVEDV. Correlation is best using the MHI method and variation is independent of LVEDV. Furthermore, there is very good correlation between LVEDV measured with GBPS using IQ-SPECT and cMRI. These results suggest that IQ-SPECT can be used for the assessment of LVEF and LVEDV with GBPS.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with multifocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, Planar Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with multifocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, Planar Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau, Vincent Finnerty, Stephanie Tan, Sebastien Authier, Jean Gregoire, Francois Harel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 511;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with multifocal collimators: Comparison between IQ-SPECT, Planar Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau, Vincent Finnerty, Stephanie Tan, Sebastien Authier, Jean Gregoire, Francois Harel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 511;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular Track

  • To Evaluated the Cardiac Function of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction by the Volume and Filling Curve of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Standard versus low-dose rubidium-82 dynamic positron emission tomography imaging with scanner-dependent bias correction for myocardial perfusion imaging and blood flow quantification
  • Evaluation of sympathetic function with PET 11C-hydroxyephedrine (HED) and ammonia (13N-NH3) in a canine pacing model of atrial fibrillation
Show more Cardiovascular Track

New Developments in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

  • Normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging has a limited prognostic value in patients with severely reduced renal function: a sub-study of J-ACCESS3
  • Changes in Prevalence of Ischemia over Time among Patients Referred for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: PET vs. SPECT Comparison
Show more New Developments in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire