Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportNeurosciences Track

Role of partial volume correction in paired studies of C-11 PiB vs F-18 florbetapir: implications for centiloid?

Dean Wong, Olivier Rousset, Ayon Nandi, Michael Pontecorvo, Kelly Kitzmiller, Paul Rosenberg, Josh Roberts, Noble George, James Brasic, Wael Marashdeh, Lorena Gapasin and Mark Schmidt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 486;
Dean Wong
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Rousset
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayon Nandi
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Pontecorvo
1Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Philadelphia PA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Kitzmiller
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Rosenberg
3Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josh Roberts
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noble George
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Brasic
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wael Marashdeh
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorena Gapasin
4Radiology and Radiological Sciences Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Schmidt
2Janssen/J and J Beerse Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

486

Objectives: PET imaging is significantly compromised by a number of resolution degrading factors, resulting in undesirable cross-contamination between adjacent functional regions, i.e. the partial volume effect (PVE). Established methods require well-registered, well-segmented anatomic (e.g. MRI) images for partial volume correction (PVC), which in turn can help improve clinical outcome measurements. Methods: We applied the current Geometric Transfer Matrix (GTM)1 to a preliminary dataset of 5 people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Age: M=63.0, SD=10.0, Range=51-74; MMSE: M=18.4, SD=8.2, Range=8-27) and 6 healthy controls (HC) (Age: M=62.8, SD=8.0, Range=51-75; MMSE: M=28.8, SD=1.0, Range=8-27) scanned with both AV45 and PiB (Days Between Scans: M=11.3, SD=7.4; excluding one outlier of 141 days) (Table 1). For both tracers, distribution volume ratio (DVR, reference region cerebellum) was calculated with and without PVC. Results: Our results show that PVC improves the agreement between the two amyloid tracers (AV45 and PiB) and increases the discrimination between AD and HC, in agreement with others2,3,4. Regression analysis (i.e., testing the linear model DVRAV45 = β[DVRPIB] + ϵ ) was used to test the relationship of DVR values across both tracers. The coefficient of determination R2 improved slightly from 0.7 (without PVC) to 0.8 (with PVC), while preserving ß around 0.6 (slope). This improvement in R2 was also seen when looking at AD subjects only (Figure 1). PVC also had a significant effect on the difference between AD and HC, most significantly in motor cortex (p=0.01), limbic region (p=0.04), temporal lobe (p=0.03), parietal lobe (p=0.04) and at a trend level in frontal cortex (p=0.06). Mean DVR values at all combinations of groups/tracers/PVC status is given in (Figure 2) L and R indicate left and right sides, respectively. Conclusions: This finding not only confirms the discriminatory value of dynamic PVC but is an important factor to consider in determining the local centiloid relationship of 18F amyloid tracer with [11C]PiB. References: 1. Rousset OG, et al. J Nucl Med. (1998). 39(5):904-911. 2. Rullman M, et al, J Ncul, Med. (2016) 57(2):198-203 3. Kanetaka H, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2004) 31(7):975-980 4. Meltzer CC, et al. J Nucl Med (2004) 41(11):1842-1848

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1: Subject Demographics: Mean +/- SD (Range)

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of partial volume correction in paired studies of C-11 PiB vs F-18 florbetapir: implications for centiloid?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Role of partial volume correction in paired studies of C-11 PiB vs F-18 florbetapir: implications for centiloid?
Dean Wong, Olivier Rousset, Ayon Nandi, Michael Pontecorvo, Kelly Kitzmiller, Paul Rosenberg, Josh Roberts, Noble George, James Brasic, Wael Marashdeh, Lorena Gapasin, Mark Schmidt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 486;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Role of partial volume correction in paired studies of C-11 PiB vs F-18 florbetapir: implications for centiloid?
Dean Wong, Olivier Rousset, Ayon Nandi, Michael Pontecorvo, Kelly Kitzmiller, Paul Rosenberg, Josh Roberts, Noble George, James Brasic, Wael Marashdeh, Lorena Gapasin, Mark Schmidt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 486;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurosciences Track

  • Impact of cognitive reserve in frontotemporal dementia illustrated by FDG-PET.
  • Quantification of brain cholinergic denervation in dementia with Lewy bodies using PET imaging with 18F-FEOBV
  • Kinetic evaluation of [18F]MOZAT PET imaging in humans.
Show more Neurosciences Track

Advancing Amyloid Imaging

  • Stratifying the mortality risk of patients with cognitive impairment using PIB and FDG PET.
  • Correlation of Amyloid PET in Centiloid units with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease
Show more Advancing Amyloid Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire