Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleIssues and Controversies

Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks

James R. Duncan, Michael R. Lieber, Noritaka Adachi and Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2018, 59 (7) 1014-1016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.210252
James R. Duncan
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Lieber
2USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noritaka Adachi
3Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Wahl
1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Overview of nonhomologous end joining (13). Schematic of a DNA DSB and its repair by NHEJ (top). Ku70–Ku80 heterodimer (Ku) binds to ends of DSB and improves subsequent binding by NHEJ polymerase, nuclease, and ligase complexes. These enzymes can act on ends of DSB in any order to resect and add nucleotides. Multiple rounds of resection and addition are possible. Nuclease and polymerase activities at each of the 2 DNA ends appear to be independent. Microhomology between the 2 DNA ends—present (dashed boxes), or newly created when polymerases add nucleotides in template-independent manner—is often used to guide end joining. The process is error-prone and can result in diverse DNA sequences at the repair junction (bottom). Although NHEJ is also less commonly capable of joining 2 DNA ends without nucleotide loss from either DNA end and without any addition, ends of radiation-induced DSBs are not amenable to direct ligation but rather require end-processing by nucleases or polymerases. Nucleotide additions are depicted in green lowercase. (Adapted with permission of (13).)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Form of the Dose–Response for Radiation Tumorigenesis (2)

    StepDescription*
    1Increasing exposure leads to linear increase in number of electron tracks, which increases probability of biologic effect (2).
    2DNA DSBs are most concerning biologic effect (2,7,9–11).
    3Cellular response to DSBs often leads to cells that survive the damage but contain DNA mutations (2,5–7,8,12,16).
    4DNA mutations lead to cancer initiation and progression in humans (2,6).
    • ↵* Only an abbreviated reference list is provided. The BEIR VII report provides a more comprehensive list that was current as of 2006.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 7
July 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks
James R. Duncan, Michael R. Lieber, Noritaka Adachi, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2018, 59 (7) 1014-1016; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210252

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks
James R. Duncan, Michael R. Lieber, Noritaka Adachi, Richard L. Wahl
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2018, 59 (7) 1014-1016; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210252
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • MECHANISTIC MODEL FOR RADIATION-INDUCED NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION
    • DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE AND THE FIDELITY OF DNA REPAIR
    • REMOVAL OF CELLS WITH DAMAGED DNA
    • SUMMARY
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • The BEIR VII Estimates of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks Are Based on Faulty Assumptions and Data Analyses: A Call for Reassessment
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Facilitating the End of the Linear No-Threshold Model Era
  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine in the United States
  • Scientific Fraud, Publication Bias, and Honorary Authorship in Nuclear Medicine
Show more Issues and Controversies

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire