Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleRadiobiology/Dosimetry

Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 18F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies

Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Pat Zanzonico, Kevin D. Staton, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Serge Lyashchenko, Eva Burnazi, Hanwen Zhang, Jason S. Lewis, Ronald Blasberg, Steven M. Larson, Wolfgang A. Weber and Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2018, 59 (1) 147-153; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.193169
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
1Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pat Zanzonico
3Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin D. Staton
4Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge A. Carrasquillo
1Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Reidy-Lagunes
5GI Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Lyashchenko
4Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
6Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Burnazi
4Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
5GI Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanwen Zhang
4Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason S. Lewis
4Radiochemistry & Molecular Imaging Probe Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
6Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Blasberg
6Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
7Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Larson
1Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
2Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
6Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Weber
1Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shakeel Modak
8Pediatric Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Whole-body (A) and -blood (B) clearance time–activity curves. Whole-body activity showed monoexponential clearance, and blood activity showed biexponential clearance. Para = paraganglioma; Pheo = pheochromocytoma.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Patient with metastatic pheochromocytoma. Whole-body maximum-intensity-projection scans of 18F-MFBG obtained 30–60 min after injection (A), 1–2 h after injection (B), and 3–4 h after injection (C) as against a uniform SUV scale (right bar). Lesions are distinctly seen in the liver at 1–2 h and 3–4 h after injection (B and C; arrows). Fused images show lesions more distinctly in liver (D and E; arrows). Lesion in maximum-intensity-projection image is localized to left iliac bone (F; short arrow).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Uptake in normal organs at various scan times after injection. (A) Uptake decreases from scan 1 (0.5–1 h after injection) to scan 2 (1–2 h after injection) and scan 3 (3–4 h after injection). (B) Prominent activity is seen in liver, which decreases over time. Focal uptake posteromedially is uptake along adrenal (SUV 5.6). (C) Cardiac activity is most prominent in early images, decreasing with time; distribution is seen along the ventricular myocardium. (D) Diffuse uptake is seen along pancreas (SUV 3.5); posteromedial uptake is physiologic uptake in adrenal gland. (E) Uptake is seen in prostate (SUV 5.6).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Patient with neuroblastoma for follow-up evaluation and possible therapy with 131I-MIBG. 123I-MIBG images (A, anterior; B, posterior) show foci of suspicious activity in skull, lumbar vertebra, right and left acetabula, and right femur (black arrows). Patient underwent imaging with 162 MBq of 18F-MFBG a wk later. Whole-body maximum-intensity-projection scans with 18F-MFBG (C and D) show all lesions seen on 123I-MIBG scan but with greater contrast and clarity (black arrows). In addition, several lesions are seen on 18F-MFBG scan only (red arrows) that are not visible on 123I-MIBG images. For example, fused PET/CT transaxial 18F-MFBG image (F) shows intense uptake in left acetabulum (red arrow), suspicious for disease, that is not seen on 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT fused transaxial image (E). Also, left iliac bone lesions are clearly avid on 18F-MFBG (H) vs. 123I-MIBG imaging (G).

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Tumor–to–normal bone and soft-tissue uptake ratios at different scan times after injection of 18F-MFBG (scan 1 at 30–60 min, scan 2 at 60–120 min, and scan 3 at 180–240 min). Uptake ratios were based on mean SUVs in respective tissues of 10 patients. Numbers = number of observations (i.e., lesions); error bars = SE of mean.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    18F-MFBG: Normal-Organ Absorbed Doses

    mGy/MBqcGy/mCi
    OrganMeanSDMeanSD
    Salivary gland0.0580.0690.2130.253
    Adrenals0.0230.0240.0850.089
    Brain0.0040.0020.0140.008
    Breasts0.0050.0020.0170.008
    Gallbladder wall0.0120.0050.0460.020
    Lower large intestine wall0.0110.0050.0410.020
    Small intestine0.0090.0040.0330.015
    Stomach wall0.0070.0030.0270.012
    Upper large intestine wall0.0090.0040.0320.014
    Heart wall0.0310.0160.1150.057
    Kidneys0.0280.0250.1050.092
    Liver0.0460.0260.1710.097
    Lungs0.0090.0050.0350.017
    Muscle0.0060.0030.0240.010
    Ovaries0.0110.0050.0410.019
    Pancreas0.0320.0210.1190.078
    Red marrow0.0060.0020.0220.008
    Osteogenic cells0.0070.0040.0270.013
    Skin0.0040.0020.0150.007
    Spleen0.0150.0080.0570.028
    Testes0.0080.0060.0300.023
    Thymus0.0060.0030.0220.010
    Thyroid0.0320.0280.1190.103
    Urinary bladder wall0.1860.1950.6890.720
    Total body0.0110.0110.0420.041
    Effective dose (mSv/MBq)/*(cSv or rem/mCi)0.0230.0120.085*0.043*
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Lesion Detection Per Patient with 18F-MFBG and 123I-MIBG

    Patient no.123I-MIBG + lesion no.18F-MFBG + lesion no.
    Neuroblastoma
     1911
     223
     325
     412
     5813
    Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma
     126
     21429
     324
     4920
     51429
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 1
January 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 18F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 18F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies
Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Pat Zanzonico, Kevin D. Staton, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Serge Lyashchenko, Eva Burnazi, Hanwen Zhang, Jason S. Lewis, Ronald Blasberg, Steven M. Larson, Wolfgang A. Weber, Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2018, 59 (1) 147-153; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193169

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biodistribution and Dosimetry of 18F-Meta-Fluorobenzylguanidine: A First-in-Human PET/CT Imaging Study of Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies
Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Pat Zanzonico, Kevin D. Staton, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Serge Lyashchenko, Eva Burnazi, Hanwen Zhang, Jason S. Lewis, Ronald Blasberg, Steven M. Larson, Wolfgang A. Weber, Shakeel Modak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2018, 59 (1) 147-153; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193169
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Performing [18F]MFBG Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Without Sedation or General Anesthesia for Imaging of Children with Neuroblastoma
  • PET imaging of fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) detects incipient cardiotoxicity due to anthracycline chemotherapy
  • PET/MRI in Pediatric Neuroimaging: Primer for Clinical Practice
  • Radiotracers to Address Unmet Clinical Needs in Cardiovascular Imaging, Part 1: Technical Considerations and Perfusion and Neuronal Imaging
  • Mars Shot for Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Molecularly Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Advances in adrenal tumors 2018
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Radiobiology/Dosimetry

  • Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies
  • γ-Tocotrienol–Loaded Liposomes for Radioprotection from Hematopoietic Side Effects Caused by Radiotherapeutic Drugs
  • Dose–Effect Relationships of 166Ho Radioembolization in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Radiobiology/Dosimetry

Clinical

  • Feasibility of Single-Time-Point Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapies
  • γ-Tocotrienol–Loaded Liposomes for Radioprotection from Hematopoietic Side Effects Caused by Radiotherapeutic Drugs
  • Dose–Effect Relationships of 166Ho Radioembolization in Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-MFBG
  • neuroendocrine
  • neuroblastoma
  • dosimetry
  • MIBG
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire