Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEducational Exhibits Track

The added value of PET and specifically PET/MR in gynecologic malignancies

Ann Packard, Bohyun Kim, Amanika Kumar, Eric Ehman, Wendaline VanBuren, Shannon Sheedy and Ajit Goenka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 947;
Ann Packard
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bohyun Kim
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanika Kumar
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Ehman
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendaline VanBuren
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon Sheedy
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajit Goenka
1Mayo Clinic Rochester MN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

947

Objectives: 1. Review the staging of gynecologic malignancies that are essential for interpretation of PET studies. 2. Describe PET/MR imaging protocols for evaluation of gynecologic malignancies. 3. Illustrate the potentially incremental diagnostic value of PET/MR in gynecologic malignancies.

Methods: Gynecologic malignancies such as cervical, vulvar, ovarian, and endometrial are challenging both diagnostically and clinically. Traditional staging with the FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologic and Obstetrics) is based solely on clinical and surgical evaluation. However, without correlation with functional imaging, this practice places the patients at risk of under-staging and under- treatment.

Results: PET/CT is a validated tool for evaluation of gynecologic malignancies. It has been shown to alter clinical management in up to two thirds of patients and is the best predictor of overall survival. PET/MR has the potential to further improve upon the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the evaluation of gynecologic malignancies. Specifically, PET/MR may improve the assessment of loco-regional extension (specifically the MR component), lymph node staging, radiotherapy planning, detection of early bone marrow metastasis, and discerning normal physiologic activity from metastasis. Thus, it may become the one-stop-shop study for a comprehensive pre-treatment evaluation of these malignancies.

Conclusion: PET/CT and PET/MR are essential components of the evaluation and staging algorithms of gynecologic malignancies. Research Support: none

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The added value of PET and specifically PET/MR in gynecologic malignancies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The added value of PET and specifically PET/MR in gynecologic malignancies
Ann Packard, Bohyun Kim, Amanika Kumar, Eric Ehman, Wendaline VanBuren, Shannon Sheedy, Ajit Goenka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 947;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The added value of PET and specifically PET/MR in gynecologic malignancies
Ann Packard, Bohyun Kim, Amanika Kumar, Eric Ehman, Wendaline VanBuren, Shannon Sheedy, Ajit Goenka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 947;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Educational Exhibits Track

  • Global assessment of PET tracer uptake in joints using CT segmentation: a novel approach to quantify global metabolic activity.
  • Acute leukemia: The wide spectrum of imaging findings on an FDG PET-CT study.
  • PET/MRI imaging as a practical tool in evaluating mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
Show more Educational Exhibits Track

Educational Exhibits Posters

  • Quantitative 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT in patients with hyperparathyroidism
  • The value of Tc99m-MDP bone scan and SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoid rectal cancer with hypoglossal nerve palsy.
  • A Review of the Role of FDG-PET/CT and PET/MRI in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Show more Educational Exhibits Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire