Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes Track

Treatment planning in PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE considering optimization of the amount, schedule and affinity of a preload substance

Luis David Jimenez Franco, Peter Kletting and Gerhard Glatting
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 131;
Luis David Jimenez Franco
1Medical Radiation Physics/Radiation Protection, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University Mannheim Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Kletting
2Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerhard Glatting
2Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

131

Objectives: A method to maximize tumor dose by optimizing the amount and activity of injected peptide for a fixed kidney biologically effective dose (BED) and a maximum red bone marrow BED was recently developed by Kletting et al. (J. Nucl. Med., 2016) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 90Y-DOTATATE. The aim of this simulation study was to improve this method by also including the optimization of the amount, schedule and affinity of a preload substance at the example of PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Methods: A whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for 111In-DOTATATE, developed with data from 9 patients (12 series) with meningioma or neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), was adapted for 177Lu-DOTATATE and implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. For adapting the PBPK model and dose calculations to 177Lu-DOTATATE, the physical decay, dose factors and affinity of 177Lu-DOTATATE were considered while the other parameters for 111In-DOTATATE remained unchanged in the model. The PBPK model for 177Lu-DOTATATE was used to estimate the optimal treatment characteristics for the 12 datasets by simulating different injected activities and amounts of 177Lu-DOTATATE as well as different amounts, schedules and affinities of a preload substance. The activities used in the simulations were determined by calculating the maximum allowed activities within constraints for the kidney BED (<20 Gy2.5), red bone marrow BED (<1 Gy15) and the theoretical maximum specific activity for 177Lu-DOTATATE (720 MBq/nmol) for every combination of 177Lu-DOTATATE and preload substance. The DOTATATE amount was varied from 4 nmol to 256 nmol while the amount of preload substance was varied from 0 nmol to 128 nmol. The infusion time of the 177Lu-DOTATATE was kept constant (60 min). The preload infusion time was changed between 0.25 min and 120 min. The difference between the start of the preload infusion and the start of the 177Lu-DOTATATE infusion was varied from 0 min to 60 min. The dissociation constant (KD) used for the preload was changed between 2 nmol/L and 0.2 nmol/L while the KD used for 177Lu-DOTATATE was 2 nmol/L. The tumor equivalent uniform BED (EUBED) was calculated for every combination of parameters considering one or two metastases. The combination of the investigated parameters which produced the maximum tumor EUBED under the specified constraints was considered as optimal treatment. Results obtained with and without a preload substance were compared.

Results: An automated treatment planning for PRRT was implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. The simulations show that including a preload substance yields an improvement of (5±5) % (range: 0 - 13 %) in the maximum tumor EUBED, which represents a decrease of (31±27) % (range: 0 - 75 %) for the tumor survival fraction (SF). The optimal amount of preload for the different patients ranged from 0 to 16 nmol (mean (8±5) nmol) while the optimal preload affinity was 0.2 nmol/L for all cases. Co-infusion of 177Lu-DOTATATE and a high affinity substance yielded the best results. The optimal infusion period for the preload was (15±36) min (range: 0.25 - 120 min). The optimal amount of 177Lu-DOTATATE was (64±25) nmol (range: 32 - 128 nmol). The optimal activity was (33±8) GBq (range: 18 - 44 GBq).

Conclusion: An optimization method simultaneously considering activity and amount of radiopharmaceutical as well as preload characteristics, maximum specific activity and multiple metastases was developed and implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. Including a preload substance may improve the outcome of the treatment but it could also worsen it, therefore individualized treatment planning is required to determine the optimal amount and activity of radiopharmaceutical as well as the optimal type, amount and schedule of a preload substance. The maximum specific activity was the dominating constraint for the treatment optimization with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Research Support: www.mitigate-project.eu

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment planning in PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE considering optimization of the amount, schedule and affinity of a preload substance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Treatment planning in PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE considering optimization of the amount, schedule and affinity of a preload substance
Luis David Jimenez Franco, Peter Kletting, Gerhard Glatting
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 131;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Treatment planning in PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE considering optimization of the amount, schedule and affinity of a preload substance
Luis David Jimenez Franco, Peter Kletting, Gerhard Glatting
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 131;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes Track

  • Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of a novel P2X7R radioligand [18F]IUR-1601
  • In vivo evaluation of [225Ac]Ac-DOTAZOL for α-therapy of bone metastases
  • Case study: Evaluating the new University of Florida hybrid pediatric phantoms and tissue weighting factors from ICRP Publication 103 for diagnostic dosimetry
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes Track

INTEGRATED SESSION: Radiotheranostics

  • Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer- based NanoLuc-QDs for lymph node mapping and tumor imaging
  • Cycloaddition chemistry pretargeted alpha particle radiotherapy
  • A Novel Molecular Imaging Probe for Optical Surgical Navigation of Pancreatic Cancer
Show more INTEGRATED SESSION: Radiotheranostics

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire