Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Science Track

Is less more in 18F-FDG PET/CT staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck?

Daniella Pinho, Julie Bulman, Jason Wachsmann, William Moore, Fangyu Peng, Orhan OZ and Dana Mathews
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 579;
Daniella Pinho
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
2UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Bulman
3Radiology UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Wachsmann
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
2UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Moore
3Radiology UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fangyu Peng
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
2UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhan OZ
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
2UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana Mathews
1UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
2UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

579

Objectives There are variable recommendations for staging of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck (H&N)(1-5). Conventional staging by computed tomography (CT) includes imaging of the H&N and thorax through the level of the adrenal glands. 18F-FDGPET/CT is widely used for staging of SCC of H&N, mostly using a protocol scanning from the midbrain to midthigh. However, it was not fully demonstrated whether scanning of abdomen and pelvis can be eliminated without compromising accurate staging of SCC of H&N. We hypothesize that abdominal and pelvic scanning can be eliminated from 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol for staging of SCC of H&N, given the very low incidence of distant metastatic disease of H&N SCC in the abdomen and pelvis(6-9). We also assume that we can eliminate the conventional chest CT acquisition, as quality of CT component of the current 18F-FDGPET/CT is appropriate for staging. The objective of this study was to test our hypothesis by assessing incidence or rate of distant metastatic lesions in the abdomen and pelvis from the patients subjected to conventional 18F-FDGPET/CT scanning from midbrain to mid-thigh. Additionally, we analyzed if there was any added value of performing concurrent conventional chest CT for diagnostic imaging of H&N SCC metastases in chest when compared to chest findings on18F-FDGPET/CT studies.

Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant study. A retrospective review was conducted, including reports from 154 patients who underwent 18F-FDGPET/CT for staging or restaging of H&N SCC in a midbrain to proximal thigh scanning protocol (44 patients for staging and 110 for restaging) in a 7-month period. Among these patients, eighty-five patients had conventional chest CT performed during a period of 6 months prior to or after 18F-FDGPET/CT. The reports were reviewed for findings in the abdomen and pelvis and divided into 3 categories (indeterminate, metastatic disease or nonrelated other significant findings). Findings on conventional chest CT and on chest images from the 18F-FDGPET/CT were compared. The patients’ electronic health records were reviewed for standard uptake value, in correlation to primary tumor location, size, histologic grade and TNM staging. Patient’s demographics were also noted.

Results Metastatic disease in the abdomen and pelvis was found in two restaging 18F-FDGPET/CTs, one patient in the abdomen (metastatic liver lesions, stage III at initial diagnosis) and another in the pelvis (left ischium metastasis, stage IV also at initial diagnosis), both with concomitant lung metastases, with overall incidence of 1.3%. Of the 85 patients that had concurrent conventional chest CT performed, 11 patients had suspicious chest lesions on18F-FDGPET/CT. All lesions seen on18F-FDGPET/CT were also seen on the conventional chest CT, except for a FDG avid nodule that resolved (assumed to represent an inflammatory / infectious nodule). There were no suspicious lesions seen on conventional chest CT that were not seen on 18F-FDGPET/CT.

Conclusions The finding from our study demonstrated very low incidence of metastatic disease in the abdomen and pelvis in patients with SCC of the H&N (1.3%). On the other hand, no chest lesions detected on conventional CT chest were missed in the 18F-FDGPET/CT. Our data suggest that 18F-FDGPET-CT of the abdomen and pelvis may be unnecessary for initial staging of H&N SCC and in follow up of patients below stage III. Our findings also showed that there was no need to obtain a separate conventional chest CT when FDG PET/CT is used for staging of H&N SCC. These changes should allow for reduction of scanning time, cost, and radiation dose without compromising sensitivity and specificity of using F-18 FDG PET/CT for H&N SCC staging and restaging.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is less more in 18F-FDG PET/CT staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Is less more in 18F-FDG PET/CT staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck?
Daniella Pinho, Julie Bulman, Jason Wachsmann, William Moore, Fangyu Peng, Orhan OZ, Dana Mathews
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 579;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Is less more in 18F-FDG PET/CT staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck?
Daniella Pinho, Julie Bulman, Jason Wachsmann, William Moore, Fangyu Peng, Orhan OZ, Dana Mathews
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 579;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Science Track

  • Relationships between preoperative FMISO- and FDG-PET parameters and the prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
  • Radiographic and laboratory assessment of bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing Radium-223 dichloride therapy
  • STANDARDIZATION OF TUMOR VOLUME DELINEATION BY PET-CT AND CT IN PATIENTS OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER-A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
Show more Oncology, Clinical Science Track

Head and Neck I

  • Value of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity and quantitative [18F]-FDG PET parameters in predicting outcome for patients with primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
  • Heterogeneity of Cellularity-Adjusted Metabolic Activity on Hybrid FDG PET/MRI: A Prognostic Factor of Head and Neck Cancer
Show more Head and Neck I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire