Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular Track

Cardiac motion compensation improves reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET uptake quantification in the aortic valve

Mathieu Rubeaux, Tania Pawade, Tim Cartlidge, Yuka Otaki, Marc Dweck, Damini Dey, Guido Germano, David Newby, Daniel Berman and Piotr Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 506;
Mathieu Rubeaux
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tania Pawade
2Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, and Division of Pathology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Cartlidge
2Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, and Division of Pathology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuka Otaki
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Dweck
2Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, and Division of Pathology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damini Dey
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Germano
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Newby
2Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Research Imaging Centre, and Division of Pathology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Berman
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piotr Slomka
1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

506

Objectives Combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) radioactive tracer has been recently shown to predict disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis. Previous studies have used data reconstructed from a single diastolic gate (1/4th of the cardiac cycle) to avoid blurring due to cardiac motion at the expense of image noise. We examined a novel software motion correction method which allows the use of data from the full cardiac cycle in order to improve the reproducibility of quantitative tracer uptake in the aortic valve.

Methods Methods: Fifteen patients (73±7 y/o) with aortic stenosis underwent two combined 18F-NaF (125 MBq) PET and CT angiography scans within two months. ECG-gated PET images were reconstructed with time-of-flight and resolution recovery, and fused with CCTA. A variational mass-preserving image registration algorithm was applied to align PET images from 4 cardiac gates representing full cardiac cycle. Maximal Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) measurements in the aortic valve were computed for the diastolic gate images alone with 25% of the counts, cardiac motion corrected images, and ungated data (data from full cardiac cycle without motion correction) for both sets of scans.

Results The SUVmax difference (mean ± standard deviation) between the 2 repeated studies was 0.31±0.37 for ungated data, 0.30±0.21 for the diastolic gate, and 0.24±0.19 for motion-corrected data, all with P<0.001. The bias and 95% limits of agreement for the SUVmax differences by Bland-Altman analysis of the difference between the 2 repeated studies were 0.19, (-0.68 to 1.01) for ungated study, 0.07 (-0.65 to 0.8) for diastolic gate, and 0.035 (-0.58 to 0.65) for the motion corrected data.

Conclusions The use of nonlinear motion correction to compensate for cardiac motion in 18F-NaF aortic valve PET data improves the reproducibility of SUVmax measurements and may lead to enhanced value of 18F-NaF aortic valve PET in guiding clinical management and risk-stratification of patients with aortic stenosis.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cardiac motion compensation improves reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET uptake quantification in the aortic valve
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cardiac motion compensation improves reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET uptake quantification in the aortic valve
Mathieu Rubeaux, Tania Pawade, Tim Cartlidge, Yuka Otaki, Marc Dweck, Damini Dey, Guido Germano, David Newby, Daniel Berman, Piotr Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 506;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cardiac motion compensation improves reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride PET uptake quantification in the aortic valve
Mathieu Rubeaux, Tania Pawade, Tim Cartlidge, Yuka Otaki, Marc Dweck, Damini Dey, Guido Germano, David Newby, Daniel Berman, Piotr Slomka
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 506;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular Track

  • To Evaluated the Cardiac Function of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction by the Volume and Filling Curve of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Standard versus low-dose rubidium-82 dynamic positron emission tomography imaging with scanner-dependent bias correction for myocardial perfusion imaging and blood flow quantification
  • Evaluation of sympathetic function with PET 11C-hydroxyephedrine (HED) and ammonia (13N-NH3) in a canine pacing model of atrial fibrillation
Show more Cardiovascular Track

Cardiovascular Clinical Science: Myocardial Remodeling and Peripheral Disease

  • Patients with severe left ventricular remodeling and myocardial viability assessed by gated 18F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm were at higher risk for cardiac death
  • Qualitative Assessment of FDG-PET in Patients with Large Vessel Vasculitis
  • The influence of insulin resistance, renal function, and statin treatment in FDG vascular imaging
Show more Cardiovascular Clinical Science: Myocardial Remodeling and Peripheral Disease

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire