Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologists Track

The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy Between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images

Ji-Hyeon Kim, Hyeon-Soo Son, Juyoung Lee and Hoon-Hee Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2662;
Ji-Hyeon Kim
2Seoul Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyeon-Soo Son
2Seoul Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juyoung Lee
1Chungbuk University Chungju Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hoon-Hee Park
3Shingu College Seoul Korea, Republic of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2662

Objectives In SPECT image, scatter count is the cause of quantitative count error and image quality degradation.1) Thus, a wide range of scatter correction(SC) methods have been studied and this study is to evaluate the accuracy of CT based SC(CTSC) used in SPECT/CT as the comparison with existing energy window based SC(EWSC).2-3)

Methods SPECT/CT images were obtained after filling air in order to acquire a reference image without the influence of scatter count inside the Triple line insert phantom setting hot rod(74.0 MBq) in the middle and each SPECT/CT image was obtained each separately after filling water instead of air in order to derive the influence of scatter count under the same conditions. In both conditions, Astonish(iterative : 4 subset : 16) reconstruction method and CT attenuation correction were commonly applied and three types of SC methods such as non-scatter correction(NSC), EWSC, CTSC were used in images filled with water. For EWSC, 9 sub-energy windows were set additionally in addition to main(=peak) energy window(140 keV, 20%) and then, images were acquired at the same time and five types of EWSC including DPW(dual photo-peak window)10%, DEW(dual energy window)20%, TEW(triple energy window)10%, TEW5.0%, TEW2.5% were used.3-7) Under the condition without fluctuations in primary count, total count was measured by drawing volume of interest (VOI) in the images of the two conditions and then, the ratio of scatter count of total counts was calculated as percent scatter fraction(%SF) and the count error with image filled with water was evaluated with percent normalized mean-square error(%NMSE) based on the image filled with air.4, 8-9)

Results Based on the image filled with air, %SF of images filled with water to which each SC method was applied is NSC 37.44, DPW 27.41, DEW 21.84, TEW10% 19.60, TEW5% 17.02, TEW2.5% 14.68, CTSC 5.57 and the scatter counts were removed the most in CTSC and %NMSE is NSC 35.80, DPW 14.28, DEW 7.81, TEW10% 5.94, TEW5% 4.21, TEW2.5% 2.96, CTSC 0.35 and the error in CTSC was found to be the lowest.(Table 1, Fig. 1~2.)

Conclusions In SPECT/CT images, the application of each scatter correction method used in the experiment could improve the quantitative count error caused by the influence of scatter count. In particular, CTSC showed the lowest %NMSE(=0.35) compared to existing EWSC methods, enabling relatively accurate scatter correction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1. Comparison of each correction method about %SF and %NMSE based on error value

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy Between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy Between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images
Ji-Hyeon Kim, Hyeon-Soo Son, Juyoung Lee, Hoon-Hee Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2662;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Comparison of Quantitative Accuracy Between Energy Window-Based and CT-Based Scatter Correction Method in SPECT/CT Images
Ji-Hyeon Kim, Hyeon-Soo Son, Juyoung Lee, Hoon-Hee Park
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2662;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologists Track

  • The imaging research of chemokine receptor 4
  • Effect of different acquisition arcs on the appearance of each left ventricular wall in myocardial perfusion SPECT
  • To evaluate the expression level of HDACs in Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Show more Technologists Track

MTA I: Technologist Posters

  • Learning Communities and Nuclear Medicine Technology Education
  • Thyroid Incidentalomas detected on PET/CT scans: Frequency in 1,438 patients
  • 177Lu-Dotatate therapy for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: How to prepare your practice for optimal administration.
Show more MTA I: Technologist Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire