Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologists Track

Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging with 15O-H2O PET/MR- Review and Workflow Optimization

Harsh Gandhi, Dawn Holley, Audrey Fan, Praveen Gulaka, Erik Mittra, Bin Shen, Prachi Singh, Jun Hyung Park, Frederick Chin and Greg Zaharchuk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2621;
Harsh Gandhi
7Stanford University, Department of Radiology Stanford CA United States
8Stanford University, Department of Radiology Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dawn Holley
7Stanford University, Department of Radiology Stanford CA United States
8Stanford University, Department of Radiology Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Audrey Fan
2Stanford University Stanford CA United States
4Stanford University Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Praveen Gulaka
5Stanford University Union City CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Mittra
6Radiology Stanford University Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bin Shen
2Stanford University Stanford CA United States
4Stanford University Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prachi Singh
6Radiology Stanford University Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Hyung Park
3Stanford University Palo Alto CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederick Chin
2Stanford University Stanford CA United States
4Stanford University Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Zaharchuk
1Stanford CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2621

Objectives Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) is a valuable perfusion metric for evaluating cerebrovascular disease and PET imaging with 15O-H2O (T1/2 = 122s) is considered the gold standard for quantifying CBF. Until recently, no simultaneous comparison between 15O-H2O PET and MRI-based arterial spin labeling (ASL) for measuring CBF was possible. With the arrival of integrated PET/MR systems, such a comparison becomes feasible. In this study, we developed an optimized protocol and workflow to study the reproducibility of CBF measurements between 15O-H2O PET and ASL MRI.

Methods An efficient workflow is integral in minimizing radiation exposure to technologists and exam time for participants. Eight participants, five healthy volunteers and three subjects with cerebrovascular disease (24-66 years old; mean SD: 35 +/- 14 yr.; 5 female, 3 male), were imaged on a 3T time-of-flight (TOF) GE PET/MR system (Signa, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) in the supine position using a 32-channel head coil. PET bed position and MR sequences were prescribed based on a localizer and PET/MR imaging began once the overall PET detector count rate reached 5 kcps. Our protocol included administration of 3 doses of 15O-H2O, a total of 3 dynamic PET acquisitions (15 min.) were acquired per subject with simultaneous ASL MRI. Timing is crucial when imaging with short-lived radiopharmaceuticals, therefore, strict time markers were established to administer the prescribed dose. A timer is started at completion of synthesis and one person is required to meet the dose at the cyclotron, ensure a clear path for delivery to the PET/MR suite and track via spreadsheet key time points for dose assay and injection. Once the dose is delivered from the cyclotron facility, it is placed into a dose-drawing apparatus and assayed when it is ~80 mCi. At ~35 mCi the dose is taken into the PET/MR suite, with a target injection of 15-25 mCi. Following the second PET acquisition, 15mg/kg of acetazolamide (Diamox), which increases CBF by 15-20%, is administered as a 2-min IV infusion. Anatomical MR sequences were acquired during the approximate 10-15 min required for the CBF increase to plateau after Diamox. Following this, the post-Diamox PET & ASL data were acquired.

Results The average imaging time for the entire protocol was 119 +/- 8 min. In total, 23 15O-H2O injections were administered. One subject only received two tracer injections due to cyclotron issues. The average dose administered was 21.3 +/- 5.6 mCi. For quantification of CBF, acquiring the first-pass peak during dynamic PET acquisition is crucial. Therefore, we prescribed our MRI scan planes for all the sequences before the start of PET scan and automated the acquisition start based on PET detector count.

Conclusions 15O-H2O PET/MR imaging has been successful in its early stages at our facility and our initial workflow goals have been achieved. Further workflow and protocol optimization is required in order to ensure efficient dose synthesis, delivery and administration to subject. Future work will focus on further reduction of imaging time and increased patient comfort.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging with 15O-H2O PET/MR- Review and Workflow Optimization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging with 15O-H2O PET/MR- Review and Workflow Optimization
Harsh Gandhi, Dawn Holley, Audrey Fan, Praveen Gulaka, Erik Mittra, Bin Shen, Prachi Singh, Jun Hyung Park, Frederick Chin, Greg Zaharchuk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2621;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cerebral Blood Flow Imaging with 15O-H2O PET/MR- Review and Workflow Optimization
Harsh Gandhi, Dawn Holley, Audrey Fan, Praveen Gulaka, Erik Mittra, Bin Shen, Prachi Singh, Jun Hyung Park, Frederick Chin, Greg Zaharchuk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 2621;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologists Track

  • The imaging research of chemokine receptor 4
  • Effect of different acquisition arcs on the appearance of each left ventricular wall in myocardial perfusion SPECT
  • To evaluate the expression level of HDACs in Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Show more Technologists Track

MTA I: Technologist Posters

  • Effect of reconstruction conditions on quantification of 18F-FDOPA and 11C-Raclopride PET as a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease
  • Bloom’s Taxonomy of Twitter: Higher Order Thinking and the Twitter Journal Club
  • A Comparative Assessment of SUV with PET/CT by the Variation among CT Devices in PET Scans
Show more MTA I: Technologist Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire