Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology, Clinical Science Track

Direct comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with first full peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Irene Virgolini, Bernhard Nilica, Dietmar Waitz, Vlado Stevanovic, Christian Uprimny, Dorota Kendler, Sabine Buxbaum, Boris Warwitz, Llanos Gerardo, Benjamin Henninger and Margarida Rodrigues
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 24;
Irene Virgolini
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Nilica
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dietmar Waitz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vlado Stevanovic
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Uprimny
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorota Kendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Buxbaum
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Warwitz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Llanos Gerardo
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Henninger
2Department of Radiology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margarida Rodrigues
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

24

Objectives To determine the value of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for initial and follow-up evaluation of NET patients treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Methods We evaluated 66 patients who had histologically proven NET and underwent both PRRT and 3 combined 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT studies. 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET/CT was performed before PRRT, 3 months after completion of PRRT and 6-9 months thereafter. 18F-FDG-PET/CT was done within 2 months of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET/CT. Follow-up ranged 11.8-80.0 (mean:34.5) months.

Results All patients were 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET-positive initially and at follow-up after first full PRRT. Overall, 62/198 (31%) 18F-FDG-PET were true-positive in 38/66 (58%) patients. 28 patients (G1,5; G2,23 patients) were 18F-FDG-negative initially and during follow-up (group 1), 24 patients (G1,5; G2,13; G3,6 patients) were 18F-FDG-positive initially and during follow-up (group 2), 9 patients (G1,2; G2,6; G3,1 patient) were initially 18F-FDG-negative, but converted to 18F-FDG-positive during follow-up (group 3), and 5 patients (all G2) were initially 18F-FDG-positive, but converted to 18F-FDG-negative during follow-up (group 4).18F-FDG-PET showed more and/or larger metastases than 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET in 5 patients of group 2 and 4 patients of group 3, all with progressive disease. In 3 patients (progressive disease, died during follow-up) SUVmax of tumors increased 41-82% from first to last follow-up investigation.

Conclusions In NET patients, the presence of 18F-FDG-positive tumors correlates strongly with a higher risk of progression. Initially 18F-FDG-negative NET patients may show 18F-FDG-positive tumors during follow-up. Also G1 and G2 NET patients may have 18F-FDG-positive tumors. Therefore, 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a complementary tool to 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET/CT with clinical relevance for the molecular investigation.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with first full peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Direct comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with first full peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
Irene Virgolini, Bernhard Nilica, Dietmar Waitz, Vlado Stevanovic, Christian Uprimny, Dorota Kendler, Sabine Buxbaum, Boris Warwitz, Llanos Gerardo, Benjamin Henninger, Margarida Rodrigues
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 24;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Direct comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumor patients treated with first full peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
Irene Virgolini, Bernhard Nilica, Dietmar Waitz, Vlado Stevanovic, Christian Uprimny, Dorota Kendler, Sabine Buxbaum, Boris Warwitz, Llanos Gerardo, Benjamin Henninger, Margarida Rodrigues
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 24;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology, Clinical Science Track

  • Usefulness of the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) ratio in predicting the therapeutic effect of head and neck cancer-A novel parameter-
  • Early response monitoring with 18F-FDG PET/CT after Chemoradiotherapy with Cetuximab in head and neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients (HNSCC)
  • Clinical management and outcomes in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with positive postoperative-stimulated thyroglobulin antibody and undetectable postoperative-stimulated thyroglobulin at initial 131I ablation after total thyroidectomy
Show more Oncology, Clinical Science Track

Other Tumors (NET and Others)

  • Impact of Gallium-68-DOTA-NOC PET/CT on Management Of Neuroendocrine tumors
  • First-Time-in-Human Trial of Cu-64 MeCOSAR-octreotate (CuSARTATE) for Imaging and Dosimetry Estimation in Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)
  • Update of the prospective impact on management study using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients: the referring physician's perspective
Show more Other Tumors (NET and Others)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire