Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes Track

Preclinical evaluation of somatostatin receptor agonist versus antagonist radioligands for breast cancer imaging

Iulia Dude, Zhengxing Zhang, Navjit Hundal, Nadine Colpo, Julie Rousseau, Helen Merkens, Kuo-Shyan Lin and Francois Benard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1175;
Iulia Dude
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhengxing Zhang
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Navjit Hundal
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine Colpo
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Rousseau
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Merkens
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kuo-Shyan Lin
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francois Benard
1BC Cancer Research Centre Vancouver BC Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1175

Objectives Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression has been reported in a high proportion of human breast cancers, yet published results using 111In-pentetreotide have been disappointing. Antagonists have been reported to be superior to agonists for the visualization of SSTR positive tumors. This work aims to evaluate whether antagonists can improve the visualization of SSTR positive breast cancers by PET imaging. We compared two routinely used agonists, 68Ga-DOTA-tyr3-octreotide (68Ga-DOTATOC) and 68Ga-DOTA-tyr3-octeotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) with a recently reported potent antagonist 68Ga-NODAGA-Cpa-c[D-Cys-Aph(Hor)- D-Aph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys]-D-Tyr-NH2 (68Ga-NODAGA-JR11), in a human breast cancer model.

Methods All three peptides were prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis and conjugated with their respective chelator at the N-terminus. Peptides were purified by HPLC and verified by mass-spectroscopy. natGa-DOTATOC, natGa-DOTATATE and natGa-NODAGA-JR11 were assessed for binding affinity to SSTR 2a (SSTR2a) using a membrane-based competition binding assay. 68Ga labelling was performed in HEPES buffer (pH 5.0) under microwave heating for 1 min. NOD scid gamma female mice bearing the SSTR-positive breast cancer tumor ZR-75-1 were injected intravenously with the labeled tracers and used for imaging and biodistribution at 1h post-injection.

Results All three tracers had favourable binding affinity to SSTR2a, with the exception of the antagonist, which had a higher Ki value (28.9 ± 6.92 compared to 2.45 ± 0.09 for natGa-DOTATOC and 2.02 ± 0.55 for natGa-DOTATATE). The tracers were obtained in good radiochemical yield (>58%), purity (>95%) and specific activity (>2.8 μCi/mol); see Table 1 for summary of radiochemical data. The tumor uptake was highest for 68Ga-DOTATOC (28.2 ± 4.39 %ID/g) followed by 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (17.8 ± 2.32 %ID/g) and lastly 68Ga-DOTATE (15.1 ± 2.18 %ID/g). Tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios were more favourable for the agonists (41.1 ± 5.68 and 171 ± 55.3 respectively for 68Ga-DOTATOC, 44.6 ± 13.1 and 163 ± 60.7 for 68Ga-DOTATATE) and significantly lower for the antagonist 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (15.9 ± 2.01 and 47.2 ± 9.03).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1. Summary of Results

Conclusions In the human ZR-75-1 breast cancer xenograft, agonists were superior to the antagonist in terms of tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios. 68Ga-DOTATOC had the highest tumor uptake among the three tested peptides. While it is known that SSTR2 is highly expressed in this cell line, it is possible that other SSTR subtypes are also expressed. The investigation of the SSTR subtype expression profile in ZR-75-1 cells is currently under way.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical evaluation of somatostatin receptor agonist versus antagonist radioligands for breast cancer imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Preclinical evaluation of somatostatin receptor agonist versus antagonist radioligands for breast cancer imaging
Iulia Dude, Zhengxing Zhang, Navjit Hundal, Nadine Colpo, Julie Rousseau, Helen Merkens, Kuo-Shyan Lin, Francois Benard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1175;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preclinical evaluation of somatostatin receptor agonist versus antagonist radioligands for breast cancer imaging
Iulia Dude, Zhengxing Zhang, Navjit Hundal, Nadine Colpo, Julie Rousseau, Helen Merkens, Kuo-Shyan Lin, Francois Benard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1175;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes Track

  • Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of a novel P2X7R radioligand [18F]IUR-1601
  • In vivo evaluation of [225Ac]Ac-DOTAZOL for α-therapy of bone metastases
  • Case study: Evaluating the new University of Florida hybrid pediatric phantoms and tissue weighting factors from ICRP Publication 103 for diagnostic dosimetry
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes Track

SPECIAL MTA: Preclinical Probes for Oncology Posters

  • Development of Hypoxia-Selective Trapping Agents for Targeting Prostate Cancer
  • Theranostic potential of a new [64Cu]-radiolabeled R-954 conjugate for kinin B1R positive tumors
  • Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluations of 1-[18F]fluoroethyl-L- and -D-tryptophan for potential imaging of tryptophan metabolism
Show more SPECIAL MTA: Preclinical Probes for Oncology Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire