Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
EditorialEditorial

Highlights from the Updated Joint ASNC/SNMMI PET Myocardial Perfusion and Metabolism Clinical Imaging Guidelines

Vasken Dilsizian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2016, 57 (9) 1327-1328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.176214
Vasken Dilsizian
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) will periodically define new guidelines or update prior guidelines for nuclear medicine practice, independently or in collaboration with other organizations, to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and to improve the quality of patient care. In the 2016 September issue of the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, an updated joint American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) imaging guideline and SNMMI procedure standard for PET nuclear cardiology is being published addressing the areas of PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging (1). The document, which is the outcome of close collaboration between SNMMI and ASNC and among experts in the field from both organizations, has been subjected to extensive review, requiring the approval of several committees from both organizations and, ultimately, the endorsement of both the SNMMI and the ASNC boards of directors.

To ensure quality health care, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have recently implemented initiatives toward achieving effective, safe, efficient, patient-centered, equitable, and timely care (2). In comparison with SPECT, PET has superior imaging properties that help meet some of these quality goals, such as the ability to achieve a higher myocardial count density during a shorter acquisition time and with less activity scattered into the myocardial region from the adjacent subdiaphragmatic viscera. PET myocardial perfusion imaging provides high diagnostic accuracy (is effective), has low radiation exposure (is safe), requires short acquisition times (is efficient), and accommodates ill or higher-risk patients, as well as those with a large body habitus (is patient-centered), providing equitable and timely care.

Although SPECT assessment of stress and rest myocardial perfusion has been firmly established as an important diagnostic and prognostic tool for evaluating myocardial ischemia and prior infarction, the interpretation of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies has been primarily qualitative or semiquantitative. The detrimental effects of soft-tissue attenuation, which tends to degrade image quality and increase interpretive errors, have long been recognized with SPECT. PET provides better spatial and temporal resolution than SPECT and allows reliable and accurate soft-tissue attenuation correction, particularly in patients who are obese or have a large body habitus (3). In concert with tracer-kinetic modeling and robust attenuation correction, PET permits the assessment of regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) of the left ventricle in absolute terms (mL/g/min) (4).

MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION

Beyond the quality initiatives of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, an additional driver for cardiac PET comes from a new health-care trend in cardiovascular medicine that suggests a paradigm shift in the evaluation and management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) from an anatomic gold standard (coronary angiography) to a functional one (fractional flow reserve). Quantitative assessment of PET MBF in absolute terms is concurrent with the recent shift in the management of CAD. PET absolute MBF provides a valuable noninvasive alternative to functional assessment of CAD that may obviate coronary angiography. Moreover, noninvasive quantification of MBF extends the scope of conventional myocardial perfusion imaging from detection of end-stage, advanced, and flow-limiting epicardial CAD to balanced reduction of MBF in all 3 vascular territories as well as identification of early stages of atherosclerosis or microvascular dysfunction (5). Adding quantification of hyperemic MBF and flow reserve to the visual interpretation of PET regional perfusion defects has been shown to improve the detection of CAD burden and accurately risk-stratify patients with varying clinical presentations (6–9).

Absolute quantitative MBF may provide further insight into the coronary steal phenomenon, defined as an absolute decrease in vasodilator stress perfusion from resting blood flow in collateral-dependent myocardium as well as in hibernation, in which a low resting MBF may or may not increase with stress but is nonetheless viable, requiring an assessment of myocardial metabolism (1). In the case of hibernation, imaging of myocardial perfusion can be combined with 18F-FDG PET imaging of myocardial metabolism to assess myocardial viability in areas of resting hypoperfusion and dysfunctional myocardium (10).

METABOLISM

In the last few years, PET scanners combined with CT or MR have proliferated. Although the use of such combined scanners is primarily for oncologic applications, coregistration of 18F-FDG metabolic imaging with the morphologic, functional, and tissue imaging attributes of CT and MR presents new opportunities for disease characterization, such as diagnosing active cardiac inflammation in sarcoidosis, hallmarked by inflammatory injury, noncaseating granuloma formation, and organ dysfunction (11,12). Another emerging application of 18F-FDG is the identification of cardiovascular infections, particularly prosthetic valve or device infections (13–18). Use of implantable electronic cardiac devices, including pacemakers, resynchronization therapy devices, and implantable defibrillators; left ventricular assist devices; and prostheses, such as valves and annular ring implants, has become rather common in the contemporary practice of cardiology (16). Depending on the disease process, measurements of 18F-FDG metabolism can reflect the rates of cellular glucose utilization from either cardiac myocytes or proinflammatory cells that infiltrate the myocardium (1). Cardiac-device infection and sarcoidosis carry a high risk of death if not identified early and treated appropriately. In vivo 18F-FDG labeling of metabolically active inflammatory cells at the infection site has the advantage of producing superior tomographic PET images with higher spatial and contrast resolution than the labor-intensive in vitro 111In- or 99mTc-labeled white blood cell images, and at a lower radiation exposure to patients (16).

EPILOGUE

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging recognizes that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques. The updated cardiac PET perfusion and metabolism imaging guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. It is important to keep in mind, however, that the practice of medicine entails not only the science of imaging but also the art of preventing, diagnosing, alleviating, and treating disease.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 19, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dilsizian V,
    2. Bacharach SL,
    3. Beanlands RS,
    4. et al
    . ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. In press.
  2. 2.↵
    Clinical quality measures basics. CMS.gov website. https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/legislation/ehrincentiveprograms/clinicalqualitymeasures.html. Accessed May 24, 2016.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Flachskampf FA,
    2. Dilsizian V
    . Leaning heavily on PET myocardial perfusion for prognosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:288–291.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Schindler TH,
    2. Dilsizian V
    . PET-determined hyperemic myocardial blood flow: further progress to clinical application. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1476–1478.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Schindler TH,
    2. Schelbert HR,
    3. Quercioli A,
    4. Dilsizian V
    . Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:623–640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Herzog BA,
    2. Husmann L,
    3. Valenta I,
    4. et al
    . Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:150–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Ziadi MC,
    2. deKemp RA,
    3. Williams KA,
    4. et al
    . Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:740–748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Dilsizian V
    . Transition from SPECT to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: a desirable change in nuclear cardiology to approach perfection. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:337–338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dilsizian V,
    2. Taillefer R
    . Journey in evolution of nuclear cardiology: will there be another quantum leap with the F-18 labeled myocardial perfusion tracers? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1269–1284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Marshall RC,
    2. Tillisch JH,
    3. Phelps ME,
    4. et al
    . Identification and differentiation of resting myocardial ischemia and infarction in man with positron computed tomography, 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose and N-13 ammonia. Circulation. 1983;67:766–778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Youssef G,
    2. Leung E,
    3. Mylonas I,
    4. et al
    . The use of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis including the Ontario experience. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:241–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dilsizian V
    . 2014 SNMMI highlights lecture: cardiovascular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(10):9N–15N.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sarrazin JF,
    2. Philippon F,
    3. Tessier M,
    4. et al
    . Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1616–1625.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Saby L,
    2. Laas O,
    3. Habib G,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis: increased valvular 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a novel major criterion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2374–2382.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    1. Dilsizian V,
    2. Achenbach S,
    3. Narula J
    . On adding versus selecting imaging modalities for incremental diagnosis: a case-study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in prosthetic valve endocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:1020–1021.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chen W,
    2. Kim J,
    3. Molchanova-Cook OP,
    4. Dilsizian V
    . The potential of FDG PET/CT for early diagnosis of cardiac device and prosthetic valve infection before morphologic damages ensue. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16:459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Kim J,
    2. Feller ED,
    3. Chen W,
    4. Dilsizian V
    . FDG PET-CT imaging for LVAD associated infections. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:839–842.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dilsizian V
    . 2015 SNMMI highlights lecture: cardiovascular nuclear and molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(9):13N–19N.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  • Received for publication May 4, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication May 6, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 9
September 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Highlights from the Updated Joint ASNC/SNMMI PET Myocardial Perfusion and Metabolism Clinical Imaging Guidelines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Highlights from the Updated Joint ASNC/SNMMI PET Myocardial Perfusion and Metabolism Clinical Imaging Guidelines
Vasken Dilsizian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1327-1328; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.176214

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Highlights from the Updated Joint ASNC/SNMMI PET Myocardial Perfusion and Metabolism Clinical Imaging Guidelines
Vasken Dilsizian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1327-1328; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.176214
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION
    • METABOLISM
    • EPILOGUE
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Challenging Nuclear Cardiology Research: Stimulating Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Relevance
  • Is Exercise Treadmill Time or Reduction in Myocardial Ischemia the Appropriate Primary Endpoint to Assess Success of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Angina (ORBITA)?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Implementation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the United States: Lessons Learned and Ongoing Challenges
  • Prostate Cancer Theranostics: Concurrent Approvals by the Food and Drug Administration of the First Diagnostic Imaging Drug Indicated to Select Patients for a Paired Radioligand Therapeutic Drug
  • Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: We Have the Answers
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire