Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT

Faisal Nabi, Mahwash Kassi, Kamil Muhyieddeen, Su Min Chang, Jiaqiong Xu, Leif E. Peterson, Nelda P. Wray, Beverly A. Shirkey, Carol M. Ashton and John J. Mahmarian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2016, 57 (3) 378-384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.166595
Faisal Nabi
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahwash Kassi
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamil Muhyieddeen
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Fresno, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su Min Chang
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiaqiong Xu
3Center for Biostatistics, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leif E. Peterson
3Center for Biostatistics, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nelda P. Wray
4Department of Surgery, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverly A. Shirkey
4Department of Surgery, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol M. Ashton
4Department of Surgery, Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Mahmarian
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Patients screened and excluded from study entry.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Timeline in hours from admission to hospital discharge in randomized groups. There were no significant differences from randomization to diagnosis or hospital discharge in patients who underwent SO SPECT versus a normal CTA.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Time to diagnosis and hospital discharge in randomized groups. Cumulative frequency from randomization to final diagnosis (A) and hospital discharge (B) for CTA, overall SPECT, and SO groups. Horizontal line is at 50th percentile.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Cardiac events based on SPECT and CTA results survival curves show comparably low cardiac event rates in patients with normal SPECT and CTA and low rates of ICA and CR.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Baseline Characteristics

    CharacteristicTotal (n = 598)SPECT (n = 310)CTA (n = 288)P
    Mean age ± SD53.2 ± 12.252.6 ± 11.953.9 ± 12.50.18
    Female sex332 (56.1)174 (56.1)158 (54.9)0.76
    Race0.05
     Black178 (29.8)101 (32.6)77 (26.7)
     White334 (55.9)172 (55.5)162 (56.3)
     Hispanic69 (11.5)30 (9.6)39 (13.5)
     Asian8 (1.3)1 (0.3)7 (2.4)
     Other9 (1.5)6 (1.9)3 (1.1)
    Body mass index31.2 ± 8.331.8 ± 9.130.5 ± 7.40.05
    Risk factors5 (1,10)4 (2,10)0.60
     Hypertension301 (50.3)157 (50.7)144 (50.0)0.88
     Diabetes mellitus90 (15.1)48 (15.4)42 (14.6)0.76
     Dyslipidemia228 (38.1)115 (37.1)113 (39.2)0.59
     Current smoker162 (27.1)85 (27.2)77 (26.4)0.98
     Family history of CAD137 (22.9)66 (21.3)71 (24.7)0.33
    Acetylsalicylic acid within past 7 d184 (30.8)97 (31.3)87 (30.2)0.78
    Severe angina last 24 h32 (5.4)14 (4.5)18 (6.3)0.35
    Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score0.67
     0315 (52.7)170 (54.8)145 (50.4)
     1183 (30.6)90 (29.0)93 (32.3)
     286 (14.4)44 (14.2)42 (14.6)
     314 (2.3)6 (1.9)8 (2.8)
    Framingham risk score0.95
     0%–10% (low)458 (76.6)239 (77.1)219 (76.0)
     11%–20% (intermediate)113 (18.9)57 (18.4)56 (19.4)
     >20% (high)27 (4.5)14 (4.5)13 (4.5)
    • Data are mean ± SD for continuous variables; medians, with interquartile ranges in parentheses if continuous variables were skewed; and numbers, with percentages in parentheses for categoric variables.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    SPECT/CT Imaging Protocols and Associated Radiation Exposure

    ProtocolnRadiotracer dose (MBq)Radiation exposure (mSv)
    SPECT
     Rest–stress124 (40.4)1,698 ± 14811.7 ± 1.0
     Stress–rest74 (24.1)1,480 ± 50712.5 ± 3.0
     2-day35 (11.4)2,253 ± 57015.5 ± 3.9
     Stress-only74 (24.1)644 ± 3745.5 ± 4.4
     Stress–rest or rest–stress233 (75.9)1,713 ± 448*12.5 ± 2.7*
     Overall, 49 of 307 (16%) patients received <5 mSv1,454 ± 62910.9 ± 4.4
    CTA
     Retrospective126 (44.7)16.4 ± 3.3
     Retrospective with dose modulation102 (36.2)12.0 ± 2.4
     Prospective54 (19.1)5.2 ± 0.6
     Overall, 20 of 282 (7.1%) patients received <5 mSv12.7 ± 4.9
    • ↵* P < 0.0001 stress-only vs. stress–rest.

    • Data in parentheses are percentages.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 3
March 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT
Faisal Nabi, Mahwash Kassi, Kamil Muhyieddeen, Su Min Chang, Jiaqiong Xu, Leif E. Peterson, Nelda P. Wray, Beverly A. Shirkey, Carol M. Ashton, John J. Mahmarian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2016, 57 (3) 378-384; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166595

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT
Faisal Nabi, Mahwash Kassi, Kamil Muhyieddeen, Su Min Chang, Jiaqiong Xu, Leif E. Peterson, Nelda P. Wray, Beverly A. Shirkey, Carol M. Ashton, John J. Mahmarian
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2016, 57 (3) 378-384; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166595
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Controversies in Diagnostic Imaging of Patients With Suspected Stable and Acute Chest Pain Syndromes
  • Acute chest pain evaluation using coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Prognostic Role of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET–Based Response in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Single photon tomography
  • coronary artery calcium
  • cardiac computed tomography
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire