Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Validating a grid-based Boltzmann solver for nuclear medicine applications in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials for voxel-based absorbed doses

Justin Mikell, Srinivas Kappadath, Todd Wareing and Firas Mourtada
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 542;
Justin Mikell
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srinivas Kappadath
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Wareing
2Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Firas Mourtada
3Christiana Care, Newark, DE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

542

Objectives In radiation oncology, deterministic methods of radiation transport have been translated into clinical practice. Here we investigated a deterministic grid-based Boltzmann solver (GBBS) for NM absorbed dose calculations in homogeneous and heterogeneous media.

Methods Voxel-S-values were calculated for monoenergetic β and γ (1, 0.1, 0.01 MeV), 90Y, and 131I for 3 mm voxels using Monte Carlo (MC, DOSXYZnrc) and GBBS (Attila v8.0.0) with infinite slabs of soft-tissue (S, ρ =1.04 g/cc), lung (L, ρ=0.26 g/cc), and bone (B, ρ = 1.85 g/cc). Heterogeneity was evaluated by performing simulations with a single source voxel at an interface; we investigated S→L, L→S, S→B, and B→S where the first material represented the source voxel material. We report the percent difference (%Δ) of GBBS from MC (gold-standard) in the source voxel for uniform media, and the source voxel and adjacent voxel across interface for the heterogeneous media. Radial plots of voxel-S-values comparing GBBS with MC were made for the uniform media. For heterogeneity simulations, radial plots of voxel-S-values for each plane on either side of the interface were generated to compare GBBS and MC.

Results %Δ in S, L, and B absorbed doses between GBBS and MC ranged from -6.4 to -3.3 for 1 MeV β, -8.1 to -7.5 for 0.1 MeV β, -13.6 to -13.4 for 0.01 MeV β, -5.5 to -4.5 for 90Y β, -9.7 to -6.6 for 131I β, -7.1 to -6.6 for 1MeV γ, -9.8 to -9.1 for 0.1MeV γ, -19.6 to -15.2 for 0.01MeV γ, -13.6 to -7.3 for 131I γ. For the interface simulations the %Δ in the source voxel and adjacent voxel in other material were similar in magnitude to those observed in uniform media. Radial plots for both the uniform and interface planes showed that GBBS and MC were in good agreement.

Conclusions GBBS can generate absorbed dose maps in both homogeneous and heterogeneous media with clinically acceptable uncertainties. GBBS has the potential for faster computation and radionuclide-specific optimizations.

Research Support NIH/NCI R01CA138986

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validating a grid-based Boltzmann solver for nuclear medicine applications in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials for voxel-based absorbed doses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Validating a grid-based Boltzmann solver for nuclear medicine applications in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials for voxel-based absorbed doses
Justin Mikell, Srinivas Kappadath, Todd Wareing, Firas Mourtada
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 542;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Validating a grid-based Boltzmann solver for nuclear medicine applications in homogeneous and heterogeneous materials for voxel-based absorbed doses
Justin Mikell, Srinivas Kappadath, Todd Wareing, Firas Mourtada
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 542;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Data Analysis: Body Imaging

  • Effects of noisy weights on Rb-82 MBF estimation
  • Is accurate Monte Carlo-based dose calculation needed for 177Lu dosimetry?
  • Issues in quantification of registered respiratory gated PET/CT in the lung
Show more Data Analysis: Body Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire