Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Projection based patient body motion correction in Rb-82 PET-CT using consistency condition

Chad Hunter, Adam Alessio and Robert deKemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 486;
Chad Hunter
2Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Alessio
3Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert deKemp
1The University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

486

Objectives Post-reconstruction correction of patient body motion during dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) can leave up to 50% error in the measured myocardial blood flow (MBF) values, that may contribute to misdiagnosis of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an algorithm to correct for rigid patient body motion before image reconstruction.

Methods Patient-derived time-activity curves (TAC) for Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging were used in conjunction with a digital NCAT phantom and the analytical simulator ASIM to produce realistic projection data with noise for a 35 cm phantom. Instantaneous shifts of ±1 cm at 90, 120, 150, 180 and 240 s in the patient body location were simulated. Motion detection, CT alignment, and subsequent shift-correction was performed by minimization of the Helgason-Ludwig Consistency Conditions for the parallel-beam 2D Radon transform. Dynamic images were reconstructed using the OSEM-One Step Late iterative algorithm as implemented in the Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction (STIR). Blood flow quantification was calculated with FlowQuant (UOHI) using the 1-tissue-compartment model of Lortie (2007), with both regional (Flow) and global (FlowRC) partial volume correction (PVC). A baseline without motion was used to calculate relative MBF error.

Results The digital phantoms were successfully motion-corrected to 0.2 voxels (0.6 mm) of the ideal position on average. Largest deviations in correction were on the order of 0.8 voxels (0.25 cm). Automated correction of simulated NCAT phantom motion resulted in a drop of the median relative MBF error from 10.1% to 1.8%.

Conclusions Projection-based motion correction dramatically reduced the body motion-induced error in MBF measurements for Rb-82 PET simulations. The proposed, automated motion correction method appears promising for correcting patient motion prior to reconstruction, warranting further investigation.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Projection based patient body motion correction in Rb-82 PET-CT using consistency condition
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Projection based patient body motion correction in Rb-82 PET-CT using consistency condition
Chad Hunter, Adam Alessio, Robert deKemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 486;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Projection based patient body motion correction in Rb-82 PET-CT using consistency condition
Chad Hunter, Adam Alessio, Robert deKemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 486;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Image Generation: PET/CT & PET/MR: Motion

  • PET Listmode driven motion corrected images in pancreas PET/MR imaging
  • Optimization of 4D PET/CT
  • An improved data-driven method for respiratory motion signal detection and magnitude estimation from noisy list-mode cardiac PET data
Show more Image Generation: PET/CT & PET/MR: Motion

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire