Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

Analytical Validation of Automated Bone Scan Index (BSI) as an Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC)

Aseem Anand, Michael Morris, David Minarik, Anders Bjartell and Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 448;
Aseem Anand
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Morris
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Minarik
2Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anders Bjartell
2Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Edenbrandt
2Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

448

Objectives To assess linearity, precision, reproducibility and inter-observer variability of automated BSI in quantitative analysis of bone scan (BS) of patients (Pts) with mPC.

Methods To analytically validate BSI, we performed a series of simulation and clinical studies. Simulation study - The SIMIND Monte Carlo program and the XCAT phantom was used to simulate BS with pre-defined tumor burdens. To assess linearity, 50 phantoms were simulated with tumor burden ranging from low to high disease confluence, Phantom-BSI ranged from 0.10 to 13.0 BSI. To assess the precision, the second group of 50 phantoms was divided into 5 subgroups, each containing 10 phantoms at 0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 and 10.0 BSI, respectively. Clinical Study -To assess reproducibility, 52 Pts underwent two bone scans within four hours of single 600 MBq 99mTc MDP injection. Finally, 173 mPC Pts and their two treatment follow-up BS were analyzed to compare the inter-observer variability of BSI reads against the standard manual subjective interpretation of change in BS. The automated BSI was calculated using the software EXINI boneBSI. Pearson correlation, Cohen’s Kappa (K) measurement and descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the results.

Results Pearson correlation to evaluate linearity of BSI, in the given range from 0.10 to 13.0, was observed to be 0.995 (N=50, 95% CI 0.99 - 0.99%, p <0.0001). The mean coefficient of variation indicating precision of BSI at each of the pre-defined tumor burden was observed to be less than 20%. The mean BSI difference between the two repeat BS of 52 Pts was 0.007 with confidence limit of +/- 0.20. Compared to the manual subjective assessment of change in BS of 173 Pts (K 0.72, p <0.0001), the inter-observer agreement in BSI was found to be more consistent (K 0.95, p <0.0001).

Conclusions Automated BSI is a consistent platform which can standardize the quantitative analysis of BS in multi-institutional clinical studies.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analytical Validation of Automated Bone Scan Index (BSI) as an Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Analytical Validation of Automated Bone Scan Index (BSI) as an Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC)
Aseem Anand, Michael Morris, David Minarik, Anders Bjartell, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 448;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Analytical Validation of Automated Bone Scan Index (BSI) as an Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC)
Aseem Anand, Michael Morris, David Minarik, Anders Bjartell, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 448;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

  • Lipotecan acts synergistically in combination with 188Re-liposome in hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft mouse model
  • 177mLu impurity: Practical aspects of 177mLu hospital waste management
  • Radioimmunoimaging and Radioimmunotherapy of Prostate Cancer. Preclinical evaluation of kallikrein related peptidase 2 targeting
Show more Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

Image Analysis In Oncology

  • Signaling pathways alteration involved in head and neck cancer can be identified through textural features analysis in 18F-FDG PET images: a prospective study
  • Quantification of tumor heterogeneity using textural features analysis of PET and CT images provides complementary prognostic value in stage I-III NSCLC
Show more Image Analysis In Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire