Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Survey of CT dose for PET/CT localization and attenuation correction

Ngoneh Jallow, Jonathon Nye, Paul Christian, John Sunderland, Michael Graham and John Hoffman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 376;
Ngoneh Jallow
1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathon Nye
1Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Christian
2Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Sunderland
3University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Graham
3University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Hoffman
2Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

376

Objectives The CT portion of a PET/CT scanner provides localization and attenuation correction of the PET data. Unlike diagnostic CT, recommended dose levels for CT localization and attenuation correction of PET are limited. This work presents a survey of CT dose estimates from PET/CT sites participating in the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network (CTN).

Methods From September 2008 to September 2014, CT acquisition parameters were collected from 269 sites participating in the CTN PET/CT accreditation program. 168 of the 269 sites provided complete datasets for estimating CT dose (scan region, kVp, mA, rotation time, pitch, and collimation) using their standard clinical imaging protocols. The CT dose index (CTDIvol­) and effective dose were estimated using the ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator. Histograms of CTDIvol and effective dose were calculated for a scan length of 85cm (eye-to-thigh) for all 168 sites. An additional 66 of the 168 sites had multiple accreditation cycles over several years and were used to examine changes in dose over time.

Results The CTDIvol ranged from 0.5 mGy to 27.6 mGy with a median CTDIvol of 5.8 mGy (95% CI, 6.2-7.6 mGy). The effective dose ranged from 0.6 mSv to 43.0 mSv with a median effective dose of 8.3 mSv (95% CI, 9.0-11.1 mSv). The wide range of the CTDIvol and effective dose indicates a large variation in the CT techniques across sites. There was no observable pattern of increasing or decreasing CT dose over multiple accreditation cycles.

Conclusions Some of the CTDIvol values reported here are above the American College of Radiology reference level for abdomen (25 mGy). The wide range of CT doses suggests that recommendations and standardization of appropriate CT acquisition parameters would be beneficial for lowering CT dose in PET/CT localization and attenuation correction.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Survey of CT dose for PET/CT localization and attenuation correction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Survey of CT dose for PET/CT localization and attenuation correction
Ngoneh Jallow, Jonathon Nye, Paul Christian, John Sunderland, Michael Graham, John Hoffman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 376;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Survey of CT dose for PET/CT localization and attenuation correction
Ngoneh Jallow, Jonathon Nye, Paul Christian, John Sunderland, Michael Graham, John Hoffman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 376;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
  • Assessment of SUV consistency in PET/CT with annulus 68Ge DQA phantom
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Data Analysis: Oncology

  • Validation of parametric analysis of dynamic [18F]FLT PET in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients prior and during therapy.
  • Hierarchical Dual-Tracer Modeling for Rapid [18F]FLT and [18F]FDG PET Scans on Mice with Lymphoma Tumors
Show more Data Analysis: Oncology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire