Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportMolecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Sterility test positive rates in PET drug manufacturing - a comparison of the US and EU models

Eric Webster, Steven Zigler and Jessica Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 330;
Eric Webster
1PETNET Solutions, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Zigler
1PETNET Solutions, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Burger
1PETNET Solutions, Knoxville, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

330

Objectives A comprehensive sterility assurance program contains many components, including validation, microbial controls, microbial environmental monitoring, and sterility testing. In 2009, the FDA estimated that the rate of sterility test positives for all PET drugs produced in the US was 0.05%, or about 25 batches out of an estimated 50,500 batches produced annually. This estimate has not been verified experimentally. The objective of this work is to determine the frequency of sterility test positives across a network of US PET manufacturing facilities. In addition, this sterility test positive rate is compared to results from facilities in the EU to determine if differences in facilities and equipment result in differences in the rate of sterility test positives.

Methods All sterility tests in the US were performed by direct inoculation according to written procedures that define testing processes, sample handling and aseptic techniques. The results of all sterility tests for batches of [18F]FDG were retrospectively analyzed over a multi-year period. The EU model for manufacturing is in an ISO 8 cleanroom with ISO 5 areas within the manufacturing area for aseptic operations. The US model does not include a classified manufacturing area, however ISO 5 controls are used for aseptic manipulations during manufacturing.

Results In the US, the sterility test positive rate for all facilities was 0.063% in 2008. The rate fell to 0.013% in 2013. This change is attributed to procedural and equipment improvements. In the EU, the sterility test positive rate for all facilities was 0.07% in 2013. This compares favorably to that in the US.

Conclusions The rate of sterility test positives indicates that the facilities and equipment used in both the US and the EU are effective in the production of sterile, injectable PET drugs. PET centers in the US have done an excellent job at limiting the potential microbial excursions while manufacturing in an area that has significantly fewer controls than in the EU. This excursion rate enforces the ability to effectively manufacture PET drugs in a cost efficient manner.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sterility test positive rates in PET drug manufacturing - a comparison of the US and EU models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Sterility test positive rates in PET drug manufacturing - a comparison of the US and EU models
Eric Webster, Steven Zigler, Jessica Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 330;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sterility test positive rates in PET drug manufacturing - a comparison of the US and EU models
Eric Webster, Steven Zigler, Jessica Burger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 330;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

  • Design of calcium-sensing receptor targeted thera(g)nostic agents
  • Grade and IDH genotype prediction in glioma by a hybrid PET/MR with FET-PET and DSC-PWI
  • Syntheses of [11C]2- and [11C]3-trifluoromethyl-4-aminopyridine: potential PET radioligands for imaging demyelinating diseases
Show more Molecular Targeting Probes - Radioactive & Nonradioactive

Current Topics in PET Drug Quality Assurance

  • A review of the implementation of a Media fill simulation program that complies with FDA regulation
  • “Dekavil” cytokine fusion protein automated iodine-124 radiolabelling for PET imaging: production, QC & biodistribution studies in mice
Show more Current Topics in PET Drug Quality Assurance

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire