Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist Student Abstract Track

Critical deficiencies of radiopharmaceutical reconstitution and quality control instructions.

Daryn Keiley, Courtney Glaser, Taylor Antisdel and Joseph Hung
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2739;
Daryn Keiley
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Glaser
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taylor Antisdel
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Hung
1Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2739

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify deficiencies in package insert instructions for reconstitution and quality control (QC) of radiopharmaceuticals. Focus was placed on deficiencies that would affect the preparation of a safe and quality product.

Methods Preparation instructions, including both reconstitution and QC, were evaluated for all commercially available radiopharmaceuticals as of January 2015. Each package insert was evaluated for deficiencies in the following categories: absent, incomplete, inconsistent, and inaccurate information. Analysis was performed by each contributing author, then compiled and evaluated as a group. The evaluation of each package insert was based on the ability for a certified professional end user to satisfactorily prepare a safe and quality radiopharmaceutical when the instructions were strictly followed. For those package inserts that contained deficiency, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph was reviewed to determine if it could be an alternative resource.

Results There were 23 deficiencies identified in 29 analyzed package inserts for a total of 20 different reconstituted radiopharmaceuticals. These deficiencies were as follows: 15 (65.2%) absent instructions, 5 (21.7%) incomplete instructions, 1 (4.4%) inconsistent instructions, and 2 (8.7%) inaccurate instructions. Of the absent and incomplete deficiencies, all but one were pertaining to missing QC information. Though USP monograph provides detailed QC information, some QC attributes are impractical (e.g., time-consuming radiochemical purity procedure, biological distribution, and sterility testing).

Conclusions Only six radiopharmaceuticals have the adequate instructions for reconstitution and QC. The majority of package inserts do not have the suitable information which would pose safety and quality concerns to the final products.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Critical deficiencies of radiopharmaceutical reconstitution and quality control instructions.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Critical deficiencies of radiopharmaceutical reconstitution and quality control instructions.
Daryn Keiley, Courtney Glaser, Taylor Antisdel, Joseph Hung
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2739;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Critical deficiencies of radiopharmaceutical reconstitution and quality control instructions.
Daryn Keiley, Courtney Glaser, Taylor Antisdel, Joseph Hung
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 2739;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist Student Abstract Track

  • Comparative analysis of F18-NaF PET/CT and Tc99m-MDP nuclear bone scans for detecting osseous metastases.
  • Single vs. dual head using geometric mean and its effect on gastric emptying time.
  • Assessing Liver Standard Uptake Value (SUV) in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) versus those without CHF using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) as an Imaging Modality
Show more Technologist Student Abstract Track

Technologist Student Scientific Papers III

  • Bayesian penalized-likelihood iterative reconstruction of FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer.
  • A phantom study to evaluate the effect of patient weight on SPECT-CT alignment in brain imaging.
  • Radichemical Purity and Stability of Generic Tc-99m DTPA
Show more Technologist Student Scientific Papers III

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire