Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular

Comparison of clinical myocardial blood flow estimation using dynamic SPECT and PET

Stephan Nekolla, Assuero Giorgetti, Christoph Rischpler, Danilo Neglia, Alessia Gimelli and Paolo Marzullo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 241;
Stephan Nekolla
1TU München, München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Assuero Giorgetti
2Fondazione CNR/Regione Toscana "Gabriele Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Rischpler
1TU München, München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danilo Neglia
2Fondazione CNR/Regione Toscana "Gabriele Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessia Gimelli
2Fondazione CNR/Regione Toscana "Gabriele Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Marzullo
2Fondazione CNR/Regione Toscana "Gabriele Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241

Objectives The delineation of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) is a valuable parameter for characterization and monitoring of pathologies. Recent developments allowed the acquisition of kinetic data with fast SPECT systems. However, a direct comparison in patients with well-validated PET flow agents is lacking and is here evaluated for the first time.

Methods 10 patients (8m, 69±7y, 81±16kg) were imaged with PET (GE Discovery RX VCT; 720 MBq 13N-NH3) and SPECT (GE Discovery NM530c; 440 MBq 99mTc Tetrofosmin) with a delay of 11±10 days using pharmaceutical stress. SPECT data were generated with (AC) and without attenuation and scatter correction (NAC). In 10 patients rest only and in 7 rest and stress imaging was performed. Tracer injection was within the scanners and dynamic data was acquired for 15 minutes. Time activity curves (TAC) for myocardium and blood were generated using volumetric sampling. TACs were analyzed with the a 2 tissue compartment model including motion and partial volume correction. Mean PET MBF (ml/min/g) and SPECT K1 (1/min) values were used to estimate the extraction fraction, which was then applied to calculate MBF for SPECT data.

Results Table 1 shows rest and stress MBF and K1 values. MBF mean values show no significant difference. However, the variability within the rest/stress groups increases significantly between PET and both AC and NAC as well as K1 and MBF. The reason lies in the reduced image quality between the PET and the SPECT data when using short frames required for kinetic analysis.

Conclusions This direct comparison between PET and SPECT flow estimates in patients demonstrates its technical feasibility. However, it also confirms the rather low extraction fraction of standard SPECT flow agents. Although corrections can be computed from parallel acquisitions, those factors are high and further studies will clarify whether such an amplification yields stable, clinically valuable results.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

CoV: coefficient of variation

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of clinical myocardial blood flow estimation using dynamic SPECT and PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of clinical myocardial blood flow estimation using dynamic SPECT and PET
Stephan Nekolla, Assuero Giorgetti, Christoph Rischpler, Danilo Neglia, Alessia Gimelli, Paolo Marzullo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 241;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of clinical myocardial blood flow estimation using dynamic SPECT and PET
Stephan Nekolla, Assuero Giorgetti, Christoph Rischpler, Danilo Neglia, Alessia Gimelli, Paolo Marzullo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 241;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular

  • Cardiac β-Adrenergic Receptor Downregulation, Evaluated by Cardiac PET, in Chronotropic Incompetence
  • Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the 18F-Flurpiridaz Phase III Clinical Trial
  • Quantification of Macrophage-Driven Inflammation During Myocardial Infarction with 18F-LW223, a Novel TSPO Radiotracer with Binding Independent of the rs6971 Human Polymorphism
Show more Cardiovascular

Myocardial Perfusion - Quantification and Outcome

  • Fully automated analysis of attenuation corrected SPECT for prediction of acute myocardial infarction events
  • Quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging with integrated time-of-flight PET-MR
Show more Myocardial Perfusion - Quantification and Outcome

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire