Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEducational Exhibits

Playing it safe: a review of security measures to protect a nuclear medicine department

Perry Gerard, Matty Mozzor and Amrita Arneja
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1886;
Perry Gerard
1Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matty Mozzor
1Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amrita Arneja
1Radiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1886

Learning Objectives 1. Describe 2 checks that need to be performed for individuals who have access to radioactive materials 2. List and describe three layers of protection to ensure safeguards for nuclear material stored and used in the nuclear medicine department 3. List and describe four physical barriers and administrative safeguards to prevent the theft of nuclear materials used in the nuclear medicine department 4. Describe the two safeguards to ensure off hours delivery of nuclear materials are done with proper security precautions 5. Describe the method for testing the radioactive materials safeguards that have been put in place to provide radioactive materials security in the nuclear medicine department.

Maintaining effective control over nuclear material is essential for mitigating the risk of theft or unauthorized removal and is a condition of the nuclear materials licenses issued by regulatory agencies. Nuclear medicine facilities must be able to provide safeguards to ensure the prevention of intrusion and theft of nuclear materials. This security is first provided by identifying three layers of defense against unauthorized access to nuclear materials; the first level of protection is performed by site security personnel at the hospital entrances, the second level is restricted access within the radiologically controlled area of the nuclear medicine department, and the third layer of security takes place at the entrance to the area where radioactive materials are stored, typically, the “hot lab”. Physical protections that can be implemented within the department include signage, video cameras and door locks. Remote radiation monitoring with within sensitive areas can act as an early warning to potential thefts. Off hours delivery of nuclear medicines must be coordinated and supervised by hospital security. Detailed inventories as required by radioactive materials licenses must be kept up to date. Periodic unannaunced drills are used to test and verify the established security programs that have been implemented.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Playing it safe: a review of security measures to protect a nuclear medicine department
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Playing it safe: a review of security measures to protect a nuclear medicine department
Perry Gerard, Matty Mozzor, Amrita Arneja
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1886;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Playing it safe: a review of security measures to protect a nuclear medicine department
Perry Gerard, Matty Mozzor, Amrita Arneja
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1886;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Educational Exhibits

  • Challenges in F-18 FDG PET/CT: Benign Osseous Hypermetabolic Lesions
  • Do They Work? Utilizing the "Hoshin Kanri" Process in the Nuclear Medicine Department
  • Early small bowel activity may predict rapid gastric transit on gastric emptying scintigraphy
Show more Educational Exhibits

Educational Exhibits Digital Posters Session

  • Optimization of Lower Extremity Lymphoscintigraphy
  • Molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using 18-F-FDG and 18-F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT: An update on the techniques of PET quantification in the vessel wall.
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT and Musculoskeletal findings: Pearls and Pitfalls
Show more Educational Exhibits Digital Posters Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire