Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Intrapatient 68Ga-DOTATOC/68Ga-DOTATATE uptake comparison in primary neuroendocrine tumors, metastases and normal liver.

Mila Todorović-Tirnanić, Milan Gajić and Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 148;
Mila Todorović-Tirnanić
1Center of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center of Serbia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Milan Gajić
2Institut of Statistics, Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Baum
3Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

148

Objectives Two 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues [TOC&TATE; TOC exhibiting higher affinity for human somatostatin receptor 3&5, lower for 2] in vivo distribution comparison by determining standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in normal liver, primary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and metastases (mets).

Methods 76 PET/CT studies in 38 patients (1 duodenal NET, 18 pancreatic, 2 coecal, 12 ileal, 3 jejunal, 1 mesenterial, 1 in appendix) with stable disease were analyzed. 68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT were performed at consecutive controls. Mean SUVmax values were determined and compared.

Results 225 metastases (98 liver, 67 lymph node, 43 bone, 17 soft tissue), 18 primaries and normal liver were analyzed on both PET/CTstudies. Mean SUVmax values in TATE/TOC group were: normal liver 6.8±1.7/6.9±1.8, primary tumor 20.4±13.7/24.2±20.1, liver mets 15.4±9.4/17.9±11.4, soft tissue mets 15.3±16.4/17.3±18.8, lymph node mets 12.0±9.5/15.2±13.3, bone mets 7.5±5.7/9.9±8.0. TOC uptake was always higher: highly significantly in primaries, liver and lymph node mets, significantly in bone mets, not significantly in soft tissue mets. TOC&TATE accumulated higher in primaries compared to mets. The highest metastatic uptake was in liver and soft tissue mets (not significantly different compared to primaries), intermediate in lymph nodes (significantly lower than in primaries) and the lowest in bone mets. Normal liver tissue showed the lowest uptake.

Conclusions 68Ga-DOTATOC had higher uptake (that could be beneficial in theranostic approach) in primaries and mets. The highest binding (3.5 fold higher than in normal liver) was in primaries. Liver and soft tissue mets had the highest, lymph node intermediate, bone the lowest metastatic uptake. Normal liver showed no difference in TOC/TATE accumulation.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intrapatient 68Ga-DOTATOC/68Ga-DOTATATE uptake comparison in primary neuroendocrine tumors, metastases and normal liver.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Intrapatient 68Ga-DOTATOC/68Ga-DOTATATE uptake comparison in primary neuroendocrine tumors, metastases and normal liver.
Mila Todorović-Tirnanić, Milan Gajić, Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 148;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Intrapatient 68Ga-DOTATOC/68Ga-DOTATATE uptake comparison in primary neuroendocrine tumors, metastases and normal liver.
Mila Todorović-Tirnanić, Milan Gajić, Richard Baum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 148;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • The Role of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging in diagnosis and management of familial tumoral calcinosis – A pictorial review
  • Assessing the role of FDG- and NaF-PET/CT in evaluating inflammatory spine disorders
  • Quantitative analysis of COVID-19 associated inflammation using FDG-PET/CT
Show more General Clinical Specialties

INTEGRATED Session: Neuroendocrine Highlights

  • Role of Gallium-68 DOTATOC PET-CT in Neuroendocrine Tumors with Unknown Primary Site
  • Quantitative analysis with 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
Show more INTEGRATED Session: Neuroendocrine Highlights

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire