Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Disease-Free Survival in Operable Breast Cancer

Jeonghun Kim, Sehun Choi, Chang Ju Na, Yeon-Hee Han, Jeong Hwan-Jeong, Seok Tae Lim and Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1322;
Jeonghun Kim
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sehun Choi
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chang Ju Na
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yeon-Hee Han
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeong Hwan-Jeong
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seok Tae Lim
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Myung-Hee Sohn
1Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Molecular Imaging & Therapeutic Medicine Research Center, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1322

Objectives We performed this study to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters for disease-free survival (DFS) in operable breast cancer.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed 92 female patients (age: 50.5 ± 10.6 yrs) with pathologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma who had measurable metabolic tumor volume (MTV, defined as the volume of tumor with SUV>2.5) of primary lesion in preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT. PET parameters, SUVmax and MTV were measured from primary breast tumor lesion. ROC curves were used to find out optimal cutoff values of SUVmax and MTV for recurrence. Cox proportional hazard model was used with age, tumor size, presence of lymph node metastasis, tumor grade, pathologic stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, and PET parameters (SUVmax and MTV) to predict recurrence.

Results Of 92 patients, 11 (11.6 %) had recurrence. The mean follow-up duration was 47.1 ± 10.4 months (range 11.4-58.3). In univariate analysis, tumor grade (1, 2 vs 3), PR status (positive vs negative), SUVmax (>14.41 vs ≤14.41), MTV (>5.42 vs ≤5.42) were significantly associated with recurrence. In multivariate analysis, high SUVmax (p=0.041, HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.06-16.73) and high MTV (p=0.040, HR 4.61, 95% CI 1.08-19.78) were poor prognostic factors for DFS.Of 92 patients, 11 (11.6 %) had recurrence. The mean follow-up duration was 47.1 ± 10.4 months (range 11.4-58.3). In univariate analysis, tumor grade (1, 2 vs 3), PR status (positive vs negative), SUVmax (>14.41 vs ≤14.41), MTV (>5.42 vs ≤5.42) were significantly associated with recurrence. In multivariate analysis, high SUVmax (p=0.041, HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.06-16.73) and high MTV (p=0.040, HR 4.61, 95% CI 1.08-19.78) were poor prognostic factors for DFS.

Conclusions SUVmax and MTV measured by preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT are independent prognostic factors for DFS in operable breast cancer.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Disease-Free Survival in Operable Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Disease-Free Survival in Operable Breast Cancer
Jeonghun Kim, Sehun Choi, Chang Ju Na, Yeon-Hee Han, Jeong Hwan-Jeong, Seok Tae Lim, Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1322;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Disease-Free Survival in Operable Breast Cancer
Jeonghun Kim, Sehun Choi, Chang Ju Na, Yeon-Hee Han, Jeong Hwan-Jeong, Seok Tae Lim, Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1322;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • A regression model to predict tumor cellularity in patients with prostate cancer and low FDG uptake
  • Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma using Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity can be useful to select patients for radiotherapy dose-escalation in stage III non-small cell lung cancer
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Breast Cancer Posters

  • FDG-PET texture analysis in breast cancer according to molecular subtypes.
  • Correlation between 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and proliferation index in patients with breast cancer
  • Comparison of diagnostic performance of dbPET and WB-PET/CT in detection of breast cancer according to histological grade/histopathological classification
Show more MTA I: Breast Cancer Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire