Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

External radiation exposures from lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy patients.

William Erwin, Gera Santiago, Rene Romero and Richard Wendt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1246;
William Erwin
1Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gera Santiago
2Nuclear Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rene Romero
2Nuclear Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Wendt
1Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1246

Objectives To estimate the patient self-attenuated exposure rate constant and external total body doses to personnel from a 177Lu DOTATATE (Advanced Accelerator Applications) therapy patient.

Methods Exposure rates (mR/h) at 1 m from 20 therapy administrations (200 mCi), were measured at the level of the upper abdomen (A) and bladder (B), with a calibrated ion chamber survey meter (451B, Fluke Biomedical) three times; at the end of the ½-h infusion, after the first urination and at the time of release. Release was based upon ¼ of the standard limits, to account for the four fractions of treatment and recurring doses to others. The higher of the initial A and B mR/h was used to compute the self-attenuated exposure rate constant (E, mR-m2/mCi-h). Cumulative whole body doses (μSv) to the NM (NMT) and electrocardiograph (EKGT) technologists and nurse (N) caring for the patient during each 4-h infusion and uptake period, were measured with electronic personal dosimeters (RAD-60, Mirion Technologies).

Results The mean±σ (range) administered mCi was 204±8 (181-214). The calculated E was 0.0115±0.0018 (0.0091-0.0160); and it correlated significantly with body suface area, but with a small slope (y=-0.0035x+0.0177, r=0.44). The doses to personnel from each treatment (μSv) were NMT: 18.8±7.2 (8-34); N: 16.0±7.3 (3-31); and EKGT: 5.9±3.7 (2-14). The EKGT dose was significantly lower than that of both the NMT and N (p<<0.05, one-tailed t-Test).

Conclusions The average measured E was 63% of the in-air value. All patients were releasable at 4-h based on measured E and effective halflife (56 h), while keeping the dose to the most-exposed-person below 1.25 mSv and that to children and pregnant women below 0.25 mSv. The NMT, N and EKGT per treatment personnel doses were 2.44, 2.08 and 0.77 times our NMTs' daily dose (7.7±2.2 μSv, averaged over one year).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Radiation exposure (mR/h) at 1 m from Lu-177 DOTATATE patients

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue supplement 3
May 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
External radiation exposures from lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy patients.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
External radiation exposures from lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy patients.
William Erwin, Gera Santiago, Rene Romero, Richard Wendt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1246;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
External radiation exposures from lutetium-177 DOTATATE therapy patients.
William Erwin, Gera Santiago, Rene Romero, Richard Wendt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2015, 56 (supplement 3) 1246;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

  • Physiological distribution of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE: an atlas of standardized uptake values
  • Evaulation of response to TARE treatment in advanced liver malignancy by Yittrium-90 (90Y) Time of Flight PET/CT: Comparison with pretreatment 99mTc-MAA SPECT.
  • Object-specific internal dosimety studies of organs and tumors in a murine model of neuroblastoma using Monte Carlo simulation and voxelized mouse phantom
Show more Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy

MTA I: Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Posters

  • Factors influencing survival and toxicity of Ra223 (Xofigo) treatment
  • Quality of life assessment following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET)
  • The study of using Rhenium-188 liposomal drug and 5-FU in chemoradiotherapy to suppress tumor growth in head and neck squamous cancer
Show more MTA I: Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire