Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

64Cu-DOTATATE PET for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide in 112 Patients

Andreas Pfeifer, Ulrich Knigge, Tina Binderup, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne Kiil Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Palle Rasmussen, Dennis Elema, Eric von Benzon, Liselotte Højgaard and Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2015, 56 (6) 847-854; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.156539
Andreas Pfeifer
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Knigge
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Departments of Surgical Gastroenterology C and Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Binderup
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jann Mortensen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Oturai
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Loft
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Kiil Berthelsen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seppo W. Langer
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
5Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Palle Rasmussen
6Hevesy Laboratory, DTU-Risø, Roskilde, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis Elema
6Hevesy Laboratory, DTU-Risø, Roskilde, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric von Benzon
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liselotte Højgaard
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Kjaer
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
3ENETS Center of Excellence for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be visualized using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. We have previously shown the clinical potential of 64Cu-DOTATATE in a small first-in-human feasibility study. The aim of the present study was, in a larger prospective design, to compare on a head-to-head basis the performance of 64Cu-DOTATATE and 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-octreotide (111In-DTPA-OC) as a basis for implementing 64Cu-DOTATATE as a routine. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with pathologically confirmed NETs of gastroenteropancreatic or pulmonary origin. All patients underwent both PET/CT with 64Cu-DOTATATE and SPECT/CT with 111In-DTPA-OC within 60 d. PET scans were acquired 1 h after injection of 202 MBq (range, 183–232 MBq) of 64Cu-DOTATATE after a diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scan. Patients were followed for 42–60 mo for evaluation of discrepant imaging findings. The McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic performance. Results: Eighty-seven patients were congruently PET- and SPECT-positive. No SPECT-positive cases were PET-negative, whereas 10 false-negative SPECT cases were identified using PET. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of 64Cu-DOTATATE (97% for both) were significantly better than those of 111In-DTPA-OC (87% and 88%, respectively, P = 0.017). In 84 patients (75%), 64Cu-DOTATATE identified more lesions than 111In-DTPA-OC and always at least as many. In total, twice as many lesions were detected with 64Cu-DOTATATE than with 111In-DTPA-OC. Moreover, in 40 of 112 cases (36%) lesions were detected by 64Cu-DOTATATE in organs not identified as disease-involved by 111In-DTPA-OC. Conclusion: With these results, we demonstrate that 64Cu-DOTATATE is far superior to 111In-DTPA-OC in diagnostic performance in NET patients. Therefore, we do not hesitate to recommend implementation of 64Cu-DOTATATE as a replacement for 111In-DTPA-OC.

  • neuroendocrine tumors
  • cancer
  • somatostatin receptor imaging
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE
  • 111In-DTPA-octreotide
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • SPECT
  • molecular imaging
  • prospective

Footnotes

  • Published online May 7, 2015.

  • © 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 6
June 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
64Cu-DOTATATE PET for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide in 112 Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
64Cu-DOTATATE PET for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide in 112 Patients
Andreas Pfeifer, Ulrich Knigge, Tina Binderup, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne Kiil Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Palle Rasmussen, Dennis Elema, Eric von Benzon, Liselotte Højgaard, Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 847-854; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156539

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
64Cu-DOTATATE PET for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide in 112 Patients
Andreas Pfeifer, Ulrich Knigge, Tina Binderup, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne Kiil Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Palle Rasmussen, Dennis Elema, Eric von Benzon, Liselotte Højgaard, Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 847-854; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156539
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preclinical Comparison of the 64Cu- and 68Ga-Labeled GRPR-Targeted Compounds RM2 and AMTG, as Well as First-in-Humans [68Ga]Ga-AMTG PET/CT
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Choice Is Good at Times: The Emergence of [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE-Based Somatostatin Receptor Imaging in the Era of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE
  • Diagnosing metastatic pheochromocytoma: Trick lies in attention to details!
  • Semiautomatic Tumor Delineation for Evaluation of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prognostication Based on Lowest Lesion Uptake and Total Tumor Volume
  • Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects
  • 18F-FDG PET is Superior to WHO Grading as a Prognostic Tool in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Useful in Guiding PRRT: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-up Study
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection
  • Updates to the Appropriate-Use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT and Prediction of Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT for Imaging Patients with Known or Suspected Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of the First U.S. Prospective, Reader-Masked Clinical Trial
  • Improving Contrast and Detectability: Imaging with [55Co]Co-DOTATATE in Comparison with [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE
  • 64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
  • Preclinical Investigation of 212Pb-DOTAMTATE for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in a Neuroendocrine Tumor Model
  • Somatostatin Receptor 2-Targeting Compounds
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 64Cu-DOTATATE and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A Prospective Study of 59 Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Molecular Imaging of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Status and Future Directions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • neuroendocrine tumors
  • cancer
  • somatostatin receptor imaging
  • 64Cu-DOTATATE
  • 111In-DTPA-octreotide
  • PET
  • PET/CT
  • SPECT
  • Molecular imaging
  • prospective
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire