Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Staging FDG-PET versus bone marrow aspirate/biopsy for assessment of metastatic bone involvement by rhabdomyosarcoma

Josef Fox, Somali Gavane, Alison Price, Suzanne Wolden, Leonard Wexler and Heiko Schoder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 652;
Josef Fox
1Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Somali Gavane
1Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Price
4Surgery, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne Wolden
3Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard Wexler
2Pediatric Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heiko Schoder
1Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

652

Objectives To compare the performance of FDG-PET and bone marrow aspirate/biopsy (BMAsp/Bx) for detection of metastatic bone involvement (MBI) at initial staging of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

Methods Included RMS patients underwent a staging FDG-PET/CT within 3 wks of BMAsp/Bx, and < 2 wks after start of chemotherapy. Whole body PET scans (accompanied by low-dose CT) were acquired ~1 hr after injection of ~12 mCi F18-FDG (scaled to BSA for patients <18 yrs) following a 6 hr fast. Skeletal sites on PET were visually graded on a 3-point scale (normal, equivocal and abnormal). Abnormal scans were categorized by number of lesions: limited (n < 10), widespread (n = >10). SUVmax values were recorded. Bilateral iliac crest BMAsp/Bx were performed per protocol. The standard of reference for MBI was clinical and imaging follow-up.

Results 88 patients (45F/43M) were eligible for the analysis. Histologic subtypes were: embryonal = 45, alveolar = 39, pleomorphic/spindle = 4. Median age at diagnosis was 13.3 yrs. PET scans were performed a median 0.1 weeks prior to BMAsp/Bx and 0.7 weeks prior to chemotherapy. PET was True Positive (TP) in 10/11 patients with positive BMAsp/Bx. BMAsp/Bx was positive in 10/17 patients with TP MBI on PET (4/10 limited MBI; 6/7 diffuse MBI). MBI was diagnosed by positive BMAsp (confirmed by RT-PCR demonstration of the presence of a PAX3-FKHR rearrangement), with negative BMBx, in 1 patient with discordant-negative PET scan. BMAsp/Bx was negative in 1 patient with equivocal PET, in whom MBI was proven by MRI. Average SUVmax for the hottest lesion per PET scan was 6.5 g/ml (range 2.4-11.7).

Conclusions FDG-PET performs better than bilateral BMAsp/Bx for detection of MBI at initial diagnosis of RMS. As it is non-invasive and does not require sedation or anesthesia, FDG-PET should be considered as a replacement for BMAsp/Bx in the initial staging and follow-up of patients with RMS.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Staging FDG-PET versus bone marrow aspirate/biopsy for assessment of metastatic bone involvement by rhabdomyosarcoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Staging FDG-PET versus bone marrow aspirate/biopsy for assessment of metastatic bone involvement by rhabdomyosarcoma
Josef Fox, Somali Gavane, Alison Price, Suzanne Wolden, Leonard Wexler, Heiko Schoder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 652;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Staging FDG-PET versus bone marrow aspirate/biopsy for assessment of metastatic bone involvement by rhabdomyosarcoma
Josef Fox, Somali Gavane, Alison Price, Suzanne Wolden, Leonard Wexler, Heiko Schoder
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 652;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis value of trimoality PET/CT-MR in digestive tract disease
  • Activity in pulmonary nodules on standard iterative compared to time of flight reconstructed 18F-FDG PET/CT.
  • 11C-acetate PET/CT for prediction of negative lymph node involvement of prostate cancer before prostatectomy
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Sarcoma/Melanoma

  • Diverse Spectrum of Noncutaneous Malignant Melanoma on FDG-PET/CT
  • The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in N and M stages of malignant melanoma
  • Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional modalities for staging of Ewing sarcoma family of tumours
Show more Sarcoma/Melanoma

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire