Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

SPECT deadtime count loss correction using monitor source method

Wendy Siman and Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 592;
Wendy Siman
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srinivas Kappadath
1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

592

Objectives Deadtime count loss (DTloss) correction using monitor source (MS) requires: 1) uniform relative DTloss across FOV, 2) images of MS w/ & w/o the object and 3) high counting statistics for the MS. The aims are to validate condition 1 and to develop a practical protocol that satisfies conditions 2&3 with minimal additional study duration.

Methods SPECT images of non-uniform phantoms (4GBq 99mTc) along with MS (20MBq 99mTc) attached to each detector were acquired in photopeak and scatter energy window (EW) using Siemens SymbiaS and GE D670 systems multiples time over 48 hours. Planar images of the MS only were also acquired. Photopeak counts for the MS ROIs were >100 kcts. Relative DTloss uniformity across the FOV was evaluated by correlating count rates in different ROI on projection images at different DTloss levels. The correction factor for each SPECT projection at every time point was calculated as the ratio of time-corrected MS count rates w/o & w/ the phantom. The DTloss corrected projections for each SPECT acquisition were decay corrected to a common time point and correction accuracy was assessed against DTloss estimated by paralyzable detector response. The accuracy of DTloss correction for SPECT through correction of projections was evaluated. A method to model DTloss for every projection based on measured DTloss for a subset of projections was investigated. The relation of DTloss between photopeak and scatter EW was explored.

Results The fractional DTloss was found to be uniform across the FOV (r>0.99), hence validating condition 1. The MS method was accurate to >99% for planar and SPECT. Measured DTloss from 3-to-5 projections/detector can be used to estimate DTloss with accuracy >98% for all SPECT projections by modeling DTloss with measured projection rate. The correction factor in photopeak and scatter EW are equivalent with >99% agreement.

Conclusions MS method can accurately correct planar and SPECT DTloss. Sparse sampling of the projection DTloss allows acquiring MS counts with high statistics with minimal increase to the overall SPECT study duration making it practical for clinical implementation.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SPECT deadtime count loss correction using monitor source method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
SPECT deadtime count loss correction using monitor source method
Wendy Siman, Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 592;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
SPECT deadtime count loss correction using monitor source method
Wendy Siman, Srinivas Kappadath
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 592;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Quantification

  • The impact of time-of-flight acquisition on PET/CT standardized uptake values
  • In situ histopathological correlation of FDG uptake by autoradiography of needle biopsy specimens obtained under PET-CT guidance
Show more Quantification

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire