Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist Student Abstract Track

Optimizing clinical DaTscan imaging

Timothy Naegle, Scott Leonard, Lisa Riehle and Stewart Spies
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2711;
Timothy Naegle
1Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Leonard
1Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Riehle
1Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stewart Spies
1Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2711

Objectives DaTscan (Ioflupane I-123) is a radiopharmaceutical used to differentiate Parkinson’s disease from disorders presenting similar symptoms. Current clinical imaging practices are largely based on research protocols and studies conducted prior to DaTscan’s clinical availability, including the use of low-energy, high-resolution collimators (LEHR) and detector rotations of 360°. The use of medium energy collimators (ME) has been reported to improve image quality in other imaging studies utilizing I-123 (i.e. MIBG) by decreasing septal penetration and down-scatter from I-123’s high-energy gamma emissions. The objective of this study is to examine the optimization of current clinical DaTscan imaging parameters.

Methods A phantom was constructed using a Hoffman brain phantom tank and fillable polypropylene spheres (PPS) grouped to simulate the uptake of DaTscan in the striatum. A known activity standard was imaged and compared with clinical DaTscan images to estimate a comparable PPS activity of 4.75 µCi/ml of I-123. Approximately 0.04 uCi/ml was loaded into the surrounding tank to simulate background. The phantom was imaged using the current clinical protocol; LEHR, detector rotation of 360° and 15sec/view. Subsequent scans were performed with the following: LEHR, 180°, 30sec/view; ME, 360°, 15sec/view; ME, 180°, 30sec/view. The current clinical reconstruction parameters (OSEM-3D; 8-iterations, 8-subsets, 6mm Gaussian post-filter and CT attenuation correction) were utilized for each acquisition.

Results Utilizing the current clinical reconstruction parameters, visual inspection determined ME imaging improved the contrast of the PPS to background, but with degraded resolution. Resolution also decreased slightly when considering a 360°, 15sec/view vs. 180°, 30sec/view for both collimators.

Conclusions Maintaining current clinical reconstruction parameters, introduction of ME alone did not improve overall image quality. However, further investigation is warranted as a limited evaluation of modified reconstruction parameters for the ME data sets indicated potential improvements in resolution, along with improved contrast, over LEHR.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimizing clinical DaTscan imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimizing clinical DaTscan imaging
Timothy Naegle, Scott Leonard, Lisa Riehle, Stewart Spies
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2711;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimizing clinical DaTscan imaging
Timothy Naegle, Scott Leonard, Lisa Riehle, Stewart Spies
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2711;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist Student Abstract Track

  • Identification of bone lesions on PET/CT imaging: A comparison of PET to CT detection capabilities.
  • The impact of manipulating sestamibi doses on extremity radiation exposure.
  • The importance of knowing where radiopharmaceuticals come from and how they are prepared.
Show more Technologist Student Abstract Track

Technologist Student Scientific Papers I

  • A comparison in the percent remaining of a gastric empty study that is acquired anterior only versus anterior and posterior.
  • Increasing the Sensitivity of Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy
  • Should the scope of practice for nuclear medicine technologists (NMT) be expanded? A technologist’s perspective
Show more Technologist Student Scientific Papers I

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire