Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Evaluation of PET attenuation correction accuracy with ultra-low-dose CT on the Vereos digital PET/CT scanner

Manoj Narayanan, Michael Miller, Chi-hua Tung, Simon Omer, Michael McFarland, James Hubenschmidt, Deepa Natarajamani and Zhiqiang Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 265;
Manoj Narayanan
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Miller
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi-hua Tung
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Omer
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael McFarland
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Hubenschmidt
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deepa Natarajamani
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiqiang Hu
1Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

265

Objectives Determine ultra-low dose CT scan parameters for PET attenuation correction on the Vereos digital PET/CT scanner when used with novel CT algorithms such as iDose (noise reduction) and O-MAR (metal artifact reduction).

Methods A CT system phantom with teflon, acrylic, polyethylene and water inserts was used to evaluate attenuation correction accuracy. For whole body (WB) studies, the CT phantom was placed inside a large water-filled elliptical phantom (simulating the 95th percentile chest circumference of North American patients) while it was scanned alone for head studies. Different combinations of tube current, iDose levels and O-MAR were tested for 4 voltage settings (80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp). The 511keV linear attenuation coefficients (LACs) were evaluated for the 4 inserts to determine the minimal operating conditions where attenuation accuracy was still maintained. A NEMA image quality (IQ) study was also acquired with 80kVp/15mAs, 120kVp/50mAs and 140kVp/15mAs CT scans and iDose levels 4 and 6. The variation in contrast and background variability as a function of different low-dose CT scans was evaluated.

Results For WB studies, LACs at 120kVp/15mAs and 140 kVp/15mAs were within 5% of the values obtained with the default setting of 120kVp/50mAs (and within 10% of the true values), with a corresponding dose reduction of 70 and 55%, respectively. For head studies, 15 mAs at 80 or 140 kVp provided LACs within 5% of the default (120kVp/50mAs) setting. The above results were also observed with iDose or O-MAR indicating that they did not adversely affect LAC measurements. NEMA IQ results indicated that changes in contrast and variability measurements were within 2.5% over the range of CT settings tested.

Conclusions Based on phantom studies, the minimum recommended operating conditions for low-dose CT scans were determined and found to maintain attenuation accuracy. CT techniques such as iDose and O-MAR, introduced for improving CT image quality, maintained LAC accuracy at these ultra-low-dose settings.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of PET attenuation correction accuracy with ultra-low-dose CT on the Vereos digital PET/CT scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of PET attenuation correction accuracy with ultra-low-dose CT on the Vereos digital PET/CT scanner
Manoj Narayanan, Michael Miller, Chi-hua Tung, Simon Omer, Michael McFarland, James Hubenschmidt, Deepa Natarajamani, Zhiqiang Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 265;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of PET attenuation correction accuracy with ultra-low-dose CT on the Vereos digital PET/CT scanner
Manoj Narayanan, Michael Miller, Chi-hua Tung, Simon Omer, Michael McFarland, James Hubenschmidt, Deepa Natarajamani, Zhiqiang Hu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 265;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Image Generation: PET and Cerenkov

  • Specific modeling of light transport in biological tissues for Cerenkov luminescence tomography
  • A non-additive interval-valued reconstruction method in emission tomography
  • Count-related bias in iterative list-mode reconstruction
Show more Image Generation: PET and Cerenkov

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire