Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Somatostatin receptor PET/CT is clinically not suitable for diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri

Nils Schreiter, Andreas Ebert, Karsten Krüger, Lars Stelter, Alexander Beck, Winfried Brenner and Vera Froeling
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 252;
Nils Schreiter
2Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Ebert
3Gynecology, Vivantes Humboldt, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Krüger
4Radiology, Vivantes Humboldt, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Stelter
1Radiology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Beck
1Radiology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Winfried Brenner
2Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Froeling
1Radiology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

252

Objectives Recently, there were some publications on somatostatin receptor (SR) expression in adenomyosis uteri suggesting SR imaging as a potential diagnostic tool in this so-far unsatisfactory diagnostic setting. The aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic value of SR-PET/CT in women with adenomyosis uteri.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 34 women with a median age of 46 years (range, 22-72 years) who underwent SR-PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our institution between 01/2010 and 02/2013. Standard criteria of MRI defined adenomyosis uteri and were used as the gold standard in synopsis with clinical symptoms diagnosed by two physicians and one gynecologist. Two observers - blinded to the MRI findings- reviewed the SR-PET/CT for adenomyosis uteri in consensus. Visual SR-PET/CT analysis was performed to identify pathological tracer uptake as an indicator of adenomyosis uteri. For semiquantitative analysis the observers determined the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the uterus.

Results Ten of 34 (29.4%) women had clinical symptoms and showed clearly adenomyosis uteri by MRI; none of them (0%) had pathological tracer uptake in the visual SR-PET/CT analysis. SUVmax of the whole uterus in women with and without adenomyosis uteri did not differ significantly (p= 0.118).

Conclusions Visual and semiquantitative SR-PET/CT analysis does not allow detecting adenomyosis uteri.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Somatostatin receptor PET/CT is clinically not suitable for diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Somatostatin receptor PET/CT is clinically not suitable for diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri
Nils Schreiter, Andreas Ebert, Karsten Krüger, Lars Stelter, Alexander Beck, Winfried Brenner, Vera Froeling
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 252;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Somatostatin receptor PET/CT is clinically not suitable for diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri
Nils Schreiter, Andreas Ebert, Karsten Krüger, Lars Stelter, Alexander Beck, Winfried Brenner, Vera Froeling
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 252;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • Renal scintigraphy following kidney transplantation – ATN, Rejection, and More
  • Assessing global coronary artery disease with NaF-PET/CT: Introducing the Alavi-Carlsen Calcification Score (ACCS)
  • Evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the workup of infective endocarditis
Show more General Clinical Specialties

Neuro Endocrine Updates

  • Prospective evaluation of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in patients with paraganglioma: Comparison with 131I-MIBG SPECT/CT and conventional imaging
  • 68Ga-DOTANOC PET-CT for restaging gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: A single center study
  • Evaluation of C-11 Metomidate PET/CT in patients with suspected primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA)
Show more Neuro Endocrine Updates

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire