Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Use of video goggles for patient distraction during PET/CT studies of school age children

Michael Gelfand, Amanda Rich, Chelsea Kist and Jennifer Harris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2004;
Michael Gelfand
1Radiology, Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Rich
1Radiology, Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chelsea Kist
1Radiology, Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Harris
1Radiology, Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2004

Objectives To evaluate the use of video goggles for patient distraction during whole body PET/CT, and to evaluate the severity of CT and PET artifacts caused by the video goggles.

Methods Video goggles with minimal amounts of internal radio-opaque material were identified and used in this study. 30 PET/CT studies, during which patients age 4 to 13 years watched videos of the patients' choice using video goggle, were reviewed. 15 patient studies were performed on each of 2 PET/CT scanners. Fused PET/CT scans were reviewed for head movement between PET and CT acquisition. CT and PET scans of the head were reviewed for streak or other artifacts caused by the video goggles. CT exposure settings were recorded for each scan for the anatomic level at which the goggles were worn during the scan.

Results Of 30 scans, only 1 scan had evidence of significant patient motion of the head that precluded co-registration of PET and CT. 2/30 scans showed minor co-registration problems due to motion and 27/30 demonstrated very good to excellent co-registration. Using a 2006 PET/CT scanner, 2/15 localization CT scans of head demonstrated no streak artifact in brain tissue, 6/15 had mild streak artifact and 6/15 had moderate streak artifact in brain. Mild streak artifact in bone was noted in 2/15 studies. For the 2013 PET/CT scanner, 7/15 studies had mild streak artifact and 8/15 had no streak artifact in brain tissue, while there was no streak artifact in bone in all 15 studies preformed on that scanner. There were no artifacts on FDG PET brain images attributable to the goggles in any of 30 studies (15 on each scanner). Average CT exposure parameters at the level of orbits were calculated to be 59% lower for the 2013 scanner compared to the 2006 scanner.

Conclusions Video goggles may be used as a patient distraction device for PET with localization CT, with no significant degradation of PET brain images and CT skull images. The amount of artifact on brain tissue images varies from none to moderate and depends on the CT equipment that is used.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue supplement 1
May 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of video goggles for patient distraction during PET/CT studies of school age children
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Use of video goggles for patient distraction during PET/CT studies of school age children
Michael Gelfand, Amanda Rich, Chelsea Kist, Jennifer Harris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2004;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Use of video goggles for patient distraction during PET/CT studies of school age children
Michael Gelfand, Amanda Rich, Chelsea Kist, Jennifer Harris
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2014, 55 (supplement 1) 2004;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • Renal scintigraphy following kidney transplantation – ATN, Rejection, and More
  • Assessing global coronary artery disease with NaF-PET/CT: Introducing the Alavi-Carlsen Calcification Score (ACCS)
  • Evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the workup of infective endocarditis
Show more General Clinical Specialties

MTA II: Pediatrics Posters

  • The experience of the dopamine transporter SPECT in three pediatric patients with Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation
  • Thoraco-omphalopagus Conjoined Twins with a Clinic Suspicion of a Shared Renal System: A Case Report
  • Which components of a bone scan for low back pain are really necessary?
Show more MTA II: Pediatrics Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire