Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Imaging of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor β Expression in Glioblastoma Xenografts Using Affibody Molecule 111In-DOTA-Z09591

Vladimir Tolmachev, Zohreh Varasteh, Hadis Honarvar, Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr, Olof Eriksson, Per Jonasson, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Lars Abrahmsen and Anna Orlova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2014, 55 (2) 294-300; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.121814
Vladimir Tolmachev
1Division of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zohreh Varasteh
2Preclinical PET Platform, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hadis Honarvar
1Division of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr
1Division of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
3Department of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olof Eriksson
2Preclinical PET Platform, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Jonasson
4Affibody AB, Stockholm, Sweden; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrik Y. Frejd
1Division of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
4Affibody AB, Stockholm, Sweden; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Abrahmsen
5Algeta ASA, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Orlova
2Preclinical PET Platform, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) In vitro binding specificity of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 to glioma U-87 MG cell line. In blocking group, receptors were presaturated by 200-fold excess of nonlabeled DOTA-Z09591. (B) Internalization of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 by glioma U-87 MG cells after 4-h incubation at 37°C and 4°C. (C) Internalization of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 by glioma U-87 MG cells during continuous incubation. Cells were incubated with conjugate (0.5 nM) at 37°C. Data presented as mean values from 3 cell dishes ± SD. Error bars might be not seen because they are smaller than symbols.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Imaging of PDFGRβ expression in U-87 MG xenograft (arrow) in BALB/C nu/nu mouse using small-animal SPECT/CT (maximum-intensity projection). Image was acquired at 3 h after injection. SPECT scale, 0.02–0.04; CT scale, 400–2000 HU.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Biodistribution of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 at 2 Hours After Injection in BALB/C nu/nu Mice Bearing U-87 MG Xenografts

    Total injected dose (μg)
    Organ0.10.5170
    Blood0.34 ± 0.050.35 ± 0.070.26 ± 0.040.14 ± 0.02
    Lung0.8 ± 0.20.72 ± 0.080.7 ± 0.20.21 ± 0.02
    Liver0.99 ± 0.07 *†0.84 ± 0.070.8 ± 0.10.39 ± 0.05
    Spleen1.8 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.20.25 ± 0.06
    Stomach1.1 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.20.19 ± 0.02
    Colon1.3 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.40.23 ± 0.05
    Kidney288 ± 15267 ± 40256 ± 19310 ± 32
    Tumor5.6 ± 1.16.5 ± 0.97.2 ± 2.40.89 ± 0.04
    Muscle0.4 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.10.07 ± 0.02
    Bone0.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.10.14 ± 0.05
    GI tract‡1.2 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.71.2 ± 0.20.50 ± 0.13
    • ↵* Significant difference (P < 0.05) between doses 0.1 and 0.5 μg.

    • ↵† Significant difference (P < 0.05) between doses 0.1 and 1 μg.

    • ↵‡ Data for GI tract are presented as %ID per whole sample.

    • Uptake in all organs and tissues, except kidneys, after injection of 70 μg of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 was significantly lower than after injection of any other dose. Data are presented as average %ID/g and SD for 4 mice.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Influence of Coinjection of DOTA-Z09591 on Biodistribution of Anti-HER2 111In-DOTA-Z02395 at 2 Hours After Injection in BALB/C nu/nu Mice

    Organ111In-DOTA-Z02395 (1 μg)111In-DOTA-Z02395 (1 μg) + 70 μg of DOTA-Z09591111In-DOTA-Z02395 (70 μg)
    Blood1.5 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.2
    Lung1.8 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.2
    Liver1.5 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.1
    Spleen0.7 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.1
    Stomach0.9 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.2*0.9 ± 0.2
    Colon0.9 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.3*0.83 ± 0.06
    Kidney238 ± 32271 ± 21215 ± 35
    Muscle0.47 ± 0.080.49 ± 0.080.43 ± 0.06
    Bone0.65 ± 0.080.77 ± 0.090.6 ± 0.1
    • ↵* Significant difference (P < 0.05) between control and coinjection groups.

    • Data are presented as average %ID/g and SD for 4 mice.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Tumor-to-Organ Ratios of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 Affibody Molecule (2 Hours After Injection) in BALB/C nu/nu Mice Bearing U-87 MG Xenografts

    Dose (μg)
    Organ0.10.51
    Blood17 ± 319 ± 528 ± 14
    Lung7 ± 29 ± 212 ± 4
    Liver5.6 ± 0.78 ± 29 ± 4
    Spleen3.2 ± 0.73.3 ± 0.55 ± 2
    Stomach5 ± 1*7 ± 210 ± 3
    Colon4.2 ± 0.7*4 ± 16 ± 1
    Muscle13 ± 3*17 ± 728 ± 7
    Bone8.8 ± 0.89 ± 313 ± 4
    • ↵* Significant difference (P < 0.05) between doses 0.1 and 1 μg.

    • Data are presented as average of 4 animals and SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Biodistribution of 111In-DOTA-Z09591 (Injected Dose 1 μg) at 1, 2, and 4 Hours After Injection in BALB/C nu/nu Mice Bearing U-87 MG Xenografts

    Organ1 h2 h4 h
    Blood0.53 ± 0.04*†0.35 ± 0.06‡0.20 ± 0.07
    Lung1.2 ± 0.2†0.8 ± 0.3‡0.3 ± 0.1
    Liver0.90 ± 0.04*0.80 ± 0.070.6 ± 0.2
    Spleen2.3 ± 0.4†1.7 ± 0.3‡1.0 ± 0.2
    Stomach1.3 ± 0.1*†1.0 ± 0.2‡0.5 ± 0.1
    Colon1.8 ± 0.4†1.3 ± 0.2‡0.6 ± 0.2
    Kidney210 ± 26*249 ± 15232 ± 66
    Tumor5.7 ± 0.6†5.9 ± 1.74.0 ± 0.8
    Muscle0.61 ± 0.09*†0.34 ± 0.03‡0.15 ± 0.05
    Bone0.79 ± 0.03*†0.56 ± 0.06‡0.25 ± 0.03
    GI tract§1.9 ± 0.2*†1.2 ± 0.2‡0.8 ± 0.2
    • ↵* Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 1 and 2 h after injection.

    • ↵† Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 1 and 4 h after injection.

    • ↵‡ Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 2 and 4 h after injection.

    • ↵§ Data for GI tract are presented as %ID per whole sample.

    • There was no significant difference between data for 2-h time point and data reported for injected dose of 1 μg in Table 1. Data are presented as an average % ID/g and SD for 4 mice.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Tumor-to-Organ Ratios for 111In-DOTA-Z09591 Affibody Molecule (Injected Dose 1 μg) at 1, 2, and 4 Hours After Injection in BALB/C nu/nu Mice Bearing U-87 MG Xenografts

    Organ1 h2 h4 h
    Blood11 ± 1*†17 ± 321 ± 6
    Lung5 ± 1†8 ± 312 ± 2
    Liver6 ± 1†8 ± 37 ± 2
    Spleen2.6 ± 0.6†3.5 ± 0.74.2 ± 0.4
    Stomach4.4 ± 0.5*†6.0 ± 0.78 ± 1
    Colon3.3 ± 0.7*†4.6 ± 0.7‡6.6 ± 0.5
    Muscle10 ± 2*†18 ± 630 ± 14
    Bone7 ± 1†11 ± 316 ± 3
    • Data are presented as average of 4 animals and SD.

    • ↵* Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 1 and 2 h after injection.

    • ↵† Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 1 and 4 h after injection.

    • ↵‡ Significant difference (P < 0.05) between 2 and 4 h after injection.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 2
February 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor β Expression in Glioblastoma Xenografts Using Affibody Molecule 111In-DOTA-Z09591
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor β Expression in Glioblastoma Xenografts Using Affibody Molecule 111In-DOTA-Z09591
Vladimir Tolmachev, Zohreh Varasteh, Hadis Honarvar, Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr, Olof Eriksson, Per Jonasson, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Lars Abrahmsen, Anna Orlova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2014, 55 (2) 294-300; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor β Expression in Glioblastoma Xenografts Using Affibody Molecule 111In-DOTA-Z09591
Vladimir Tolmachev, Zohreh Varasteh, Hadis Honarvar, Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr, Olof Eriksson, Per Jonasson, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Lars Abrahmsen, Anna Orlova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2014, 55 (2) 294-300; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121814
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Non-routine Tracers for PET Imaging of High-grade Glioma
  • ADAPT, a Novel Scaffold Protein-Based Probe for Radionuclide Imaging of Molecular Targets That Are Expressed in Disseminated Cancers
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer
  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Affibody molecule
  • 111In
  • Molecular imaging
  • PDGFRβ
  • U-87 MG xenograft
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire