Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Does KRAS mutation cause increased 18 FDG uptake in colorectal carcinoma?

Murat Tuncel, Osman Kupik, Gaye Tezel, Suayib Yalcin and Belkis Erbas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 635;
Murat Tuncel
1Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osman Kupik
1Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaye Tezel
2Pathology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suayib Yalcin
3Clinical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Belkis Erbas
1Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

635

Objectives Activating KRAS mutation frequency is approximately % 35-45 in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). It was suggested that the increase in GLUT1 expression and glucose uptake in CRC cell lines was dependent on the presence of KRAS mutation. However, there is very limited and conflicting data on the clinical application. Therefore, this study was done to investigate whether KRAS mutation affect the 18- FDG accumulation in lesions of patients with CRC.

Methods PET/CT study results and medical records of 42 patients (mean age:55±14) with diagnosis of colorectal cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the presence of KRAS mutation (23 wild-type, 19 mutated). SUVmax and SUVmean values, based on body weight, lean body and body surface area, were calculated for volumetric region of interests drawn on primary tumor or metastatic site. Volume of tumor was measured and glycolytic index (GI=volumeXSUVmean) values were calculated for each lesion and sum of all lesions. In addition, Liver (L) and blood pool (B) SUV values and tumor/liver (T/L), tumor/blood (T/B) ratios were calculated

Results SUVmax (10.7±1.2 vs 7.5±0.8, p=0.03), SUVmean (7±0.8±4.9±0.5, p=0.04), T/L SUVmax (4.8±0.5 vs3.2±0.3, p=0.2), T/L SUVmean (3.8±0.4 vs 2.6±0.3, p=0.017), T/B (6.7±0.6 vs 4.5±0.5, p=0.008), T/B mean (5.7±0.5 vs 3.9±0.4, 0.01) values were significantly higher in mutated group. Glycolytic index and total glycolytic index values were not significantly different between subgroups, due to wide range of tumor volumes.

Conclusions According to the results of this retrospective study, KRAS positive and negative tumors showed different glycolytic phenotype measured by means of SUV values and tumor to liver ratios. Presence of KRAS mutation seems to cause higher 18FDG uptake by tumor compared to wild-type tumors.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does KRAS mutation cause increased 18 FDG uptake in colorectal carcinoma?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Does KRAS mutation cause increased 18 FDG uptake in colorectal carcinoma?
Murat Tuncel, Osman Kupik, Gaye Tezel, Suayib Yalcin, Belkis Erbas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 635;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Does KRAS mutation cause increased 18 FDG uptake in colorectal carcinoma?
Murat Tuncel, Osman Kupik, Gaye Tezel, Suayib Yalcin, Belkis Erbas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 635;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • Usefulness of new hypoxia PET tests to estimate the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT in patients with esophageal cancer
  • Benefits of dedicated hepatic imaging using simultaneous PET/MRI
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

GI: Colorectal & Liver II

  • Fourteen different 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative and quantitative parameters investigated as pathologic response predictors of locally advanced rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
  • Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT in detection of local recurrence in rectal cancer
Show more GI: Colorectal & Liver II

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire