Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiovascular

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement with dynamic SPECT: Operator variability

Ran Klein, Guang-Uei Hung, Dianfu Li, Robert deKemp and Bailing Hsu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 406;
Ran Klein
1Cardiac PET Centre, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guang-Uei Hung
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dianfu Li
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert deKemp
1Cardiac PET Centre, Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bailing Hsu
4Nuclear Science and Engineering Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

406

Objectives MBF and CFR quantification with dynamic SPECT (dSPECT) could lead to widespread improvement in clinical practice with little financial overhead. This work evaluates the operator-dependent variability of FlowQuant MBF analysis of dSPECT images.

Methods 15 patients underwent rest and dipyridamole-stress imaging with SPECT/CT using dynamic image acquisition (≥10s time frames) <10s after MIBI injection. Quantitative images were iteratively reconstructed with all physical corrections and then processed using FlowQuant to semi-automatically segment myocardial and blood regions of interest (ROI). A 1-tissue-compartment kinetic model was applied to these ROI sampled time-activity-curves, and MIBI extraction correction was applied to derive MBF. CFR was estimated as stress/rest MBF ratios. Images were processed twice (≥7 days apart) by each of two operators independently. Intra- and inter-operator variability of MBF and CFR in three primary coronary territories was evaluated.

Results Mean rest MBF, stress MBF, and CFR were 1.28 mL/min/g, 2.54 mL/min/g, and 2.30. Operators 1 and 2 intervened during processing of 50% and 85% of images resulting in combined rest-stress regional MBF intra-operator correlation r2=0.98 and 0.96 (n=90, p=0.002), and Bland-Altman derived reproducibility coefficients (RPC)=0.33 and 0.53 mL/min/g (p<0.001). Inter-operator variability had r2= 0.94 and RPC=0.63 mL/min/g (n=180, p<0.001 vs. intra-operators). CFR had higher regional variability (r2=0.95, 0.88, 0.89 and RPC=0.59, 0.83, 0.83 for intra1, intra2, inter-operator).

Conclusions MBF and CFR measurements using quantitative dynamic MIBI SPECT are highly reproducible and warrant further investigation. A new human derived extraction function (compared with PET) may be necessary to calibrate MBF values.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement with dynamic SPECT: Operator variability
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement with dynamic SPECT: Operator variability
Ran Klein, Guang-Uei Hung, Dianfu Li, Robert deKemp, Bailing Hsu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 406;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement with dynamic SPECT: Operator variability
Ran Klein, Guang-Uei Hung, Dianfu Li, Robert deKemp, Bailing Hsu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 406;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiovascular

  • Cardiac β-Adrenergic Receptor Downregulation, Evaluated by Cardiac PET, in Chronotropic Incompetence
  • Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the 18F-Flurpiridaz Phase III Clinical Trial
  • Quantification of Macrophage-Driven Inflammation During Myocardial Infarction with 18F-LW223, a Novel TSPO Radiotracer with Binding Independent of the rs6971 Human Polymorphism
Show more Cardiovascular

Cardiovascular Basic: New Techniques

  • Feasibility of quantifying intramyocardial blood volume using SPECT/CT
  • Non-invasive quantification of 11C-hydroxyephidrine: Alternatives for arterial metabolite corrections
Show more Cardiovascular Basic: New Techniques

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire