Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

The dilemma of being a pregnant working nuclear medicine technologist

Frances Keech
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2645;
Frances Keech
1SMIT, MCPHSU, Boston, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2645

Objectives In the 2006 salary survey conducted by the NMTCB of certified nuclear medicine technologists CNMT; 58% of those who responded were female. The average age of all respondents was 42 years. Therefore the majority of workers in the profession could have faced or will face this dilemma. The purpose of this research was to discover the latest research on the affects of occupational exposure to the pregnant NMT and what types of accommodations are being recommended.

Methods The author used various databases to research the topic. Journals articles were reviewed along with online institutional resources such as radiation safety manuals and student handbooks. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC web site was also evaluated. Radiation Safety officers in the local area were surveyed as well as a number of supervisors and NMTs who have had experience in this area.

Results From journal articles and NRC reports there has never been a report of any deterministic affects on a fetus from pregnant technologist. There have been a few articles however published outside the field; in nursing, cardiology and anesthesiology journals for example that do warn of the risks of a miscarriage or deterministic damage to a fetus if the pregnant worker is exposed to radiation on the job. Anecdotal evidence shows that the accommodations recommended for the declared pregnant technologist range from none to suspension of all hot lab duties.

Conclusions The NRC in CFR 10:20.1208 paragraph (a) states that once the pregnant technologist has voluntarily declared the pregnancy the "licensee shall ensure that the dose equivalent to the embryo/fetus during the entire pregnancy, due to the occupational exposure … does not exceed 0.5 rem”. To satisfy this in paragraph b. they further state "The licensee shall make efforts to avoid substantial variation above a uniform monthly exposure rate to a declared pregnant woman so as to satisfy the limit in paragraph (a) ". For the pregnant technologist these "efforts" vary and there is currently a lack of research into the subject to ensure some consistency and uniformity in the accommodations.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The dilemma of being a pregnant working nuclear medicine technologist
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The dilemma of being a pregnant working nuclear medicine technologist
Frances Keech
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2645;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The dilemma of being a pregnant working nuclear medicine technologist
Frances Keech
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2645;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • Comparison images between PET and SPECT of 90Y: A Monte-Carlo simulation study
  • Predictors of pre-ablation I-123 neck uptake measurements in post thyroidectomy patients
  • Variation of the PET count in relation to the alignment of the 18F point source on PET images
Show more Technologist

Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

  • Routine PET/CT Workflow Efficiency and Scan Time Improvements Using Continuous Bed Motion (CBM) Techniques
  • Reducing SUV of the bladder in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging using furosemide
  • [18F]Fluoride radiolabelling and stability of B-F…P pincer triphenylphosphonium derivatives for applications in mitochondrial imaging.
Show more Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire