Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

Improving patient access and scanner utilization in a busy PET/CT practice

Daniel McConnell, Royce Ruter, Yariv Marmor, Thomas Rohleder, Todd Huschka and Brad Kemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2535;
Daniel McConnell
1Nuclear Medicine/PET, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Royce Ruter
1Nuclear Medicine/PET, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yariv Marmor
2Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Rohleder
2Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Huschka
2Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brad Kemp
1Nuclear Medicine/PET, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2535

Objectives The Mayo Clinic Positron Emission Tomography (PET) practice conducts over 50 clinical and research studies per day, including whole-body and brain exams using FDG, choline and PIB. As such, establishing a schedule is complicated as these exams have different scan ranges, acquisition durations and uptake times. The goal of this project was to construct a schedule to maximize patient access and scanner utilization, minimize patient wait time and maintain consistent uptake times and regular end-of-day (EOD) operation.

Methods We utilized system engineering methodology to model the patient flow through the PET imaging area. A predictive model was developed to compute the scan duration based on the patient height, scan range prescribed by the physician and time per bed for our BMI-based whole-body protocols. Injection timings, restroom utilization, in-room setup time and a no-show rate of 5% were incorporated in the model. Our three clinical scanners were modeled as ‘first come, first serve’ and it was assumed patients were not scanned prior to their scheduled time. The existing schedule and regularly scheduled time slots of 20 - 40 min duration were modeled to determine the best schedule.

Results A preliminary analysis of 4700 patient studies showed the mean duration of an exam was 25 min and 9% of exams had duration greater than 35 min. The table below summarizes the results of the modeling. It shows that by adopting the 35 minute time slot, scanner utilization increases and patient wait time and EOD will decrease. The simulation also shows that the wait time is relatively constant throughout the day. In addition, a resultant earlier EOD suggests additional time slots can be added.

Conclusions A model was developed to simulate patient flow in the PET imaging area; based on this model a schedule was constructed that maximizes scanner utilization and patient access while decreasing patient wait time.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving patient access and scanner utilization in a busy PET/CT practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Improving patient access and scanner utilization in a busy PET/CT practice
Daniel McConnell, Royce Ruter, Yariv Marmor, Thomas Rohleder, Todd Huschka, Brad Kemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2535;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving patient access and scanner utilization in a busy PET/CT practice
Daniel McConnell, Royce Ruter, Yariv Marmor, Thomas Rohleder, Todd Huschka, Brad Kemp
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2535;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • Troubleshooting dicom transfer errors in Nuclear Medicine.
  • A case study of myocardial visualization of Tc-99m MAA during lung perfusion: superior vena cava obstruction and systemic to pulmonary venous shunt
  • Evaluation of brain dopamine transporter SPECT images using iterative reconstruction and attenuation correction
Show more Technologist

Technologist Papers V: Professional Practices & Educational Exhibits/Pre-clinical Studies

  • Reproducibility of 18F-FAZA PET-CT mouse imaging
  • Gastric emptying on a rat model using planar μSPECT overlays on μCT scout images
Show more Technologist Papers V: Professional Practices & Educational Exhibits/Pre-clinical Studies

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire