Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Lung scintigraphy: Use of different interpretative criteria in patients with low pretest probability for pulmonary embolism

Marko Grmek, Ajda Skarlovnik and Jurij Fettich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2020;
Marko Grmek
1Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajda Skarlovnik
2Dept. of Vascular Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jurij Fettich
1Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2020

Objectives To investigate the usefulness of different interpretative criteria used in lung scintigraphy in patients with low pretest probability for PE.

Methods In the study were included 62 patients (33 M and 29 F) with low pretest probability for PE (according to Wells’ criteria) in whom ventitilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy was performed in year 2010. All patients had a chest radiograph performed before V/Q scintigraphy. Mean age of patients was 70. Final diagnosis of PE was a composite based on clinical decision of the attending physician and evaluation of a 6-12 months follow-up period. V/Q scintigraphy: Technegas was used for ventilation studies and 150 MBq of 99mTc-MAA for perfusion studies. Ventilation and perfusion scintigrams were done in at least posterior, anterior, left and right posterior oblique projection. Diagnostic criteria: Modified PIOPED II, PISAPED and 0.5 segment mismatch (SM) criteria were used for scan interpretation. In 0.5 SM criteria we did a little change compared to modified PIOPED II criteria. The only change was that one mismatched defect bigger than 0,5 segment represented nondiagnostic result instead of 1-3 small segmental defects as it is in modified PIOPED II criteria.

Results Results of lung scintigraphy using different interpretative criteria are presented in the table. PE was confirmed as the final diagnosis in 2 patients and it was correctly diagnosed with all three interpretative criteria. PISAPED criteria had also 3 false positive results. There were no false negative results in our study. The percentage of nondiagnostic results is the smallest if 0.5 SM criteria were used.

Conclusions We recommend the use of 0.5 SM interpretative criteria if V/Q scintigraphy is done in patients with low pretest probability for PE. Lung perfusion scintigrapy in combination with PISAPED interpretative criteria are inappropriate for use in patients with low pretest probability for PE.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lung scintigraphy: Use of different interpretative criteria in patients with low pretest probability for pulmonary embolism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Lung scintigraphy: Use of different interpretative criteria in patients with low pretest probability for pulmonary embolism
Marko Grmek, Ajda Skarlovnik, Jurij Fettich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2020;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lung scintigraphy: Use of different interpretative criteria in patients with low pretest probability for pulmonary embolism
Marko Grmek, Ajda Skarlovnik, Jurij Fettich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 2020;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • The Role of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging in diagnosis and management of familial tumoral calcinosis – A pictorial review
  • Assessing the role of FDG- and NaF-PET/CT in evaluating inflammatory spine disorders
  • Quantitative analysis of COVID-19 associated inflammation using FDG-PET/CT
Show more General Clinical Specialties

MTA II: Pulmonary Posters

  • Investigation of 99mtc-maa pulmonary perfusion spect/ct findings in patients with pulmonary hypertension caused by various diseases
  • CT-based 3D quantification of relative pulmonary lobe perfusion from SPECT in preoperative lung cancer patients: Comparing a manual and a semi-automatic approach
  • SUVmean of background lung in FDG-PET/CT provides clinical information and prognostic stratification in interstitial lung disease
Show more MTA II: Pulmonary Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire