Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Optimization of PET acquisition and reconstruction for head and neck PET/MRI

Benedicte Delattre, Arthur Varoquaux, Olivier Rager, Antonis Kalemis, Osman Ratib and Minerva Becker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1522;
Benedicte Delattre
1Philips Healthcare, Gland, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur Varoquaux
2Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Rager
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonis Kalemis
4Philips Healthcare, Guilford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osman Ratib
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minerva Becker
2Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1522

Objectives Head and Neck (HN) cancer staging may benefit from new hybrid technology such as PET/MRI. The dilemma between a sufficiently long PET acquisition for good quality 2 mm voxel size reconstructions with neurovascular MRI coil attenuation and a short acquisition time due to limited patient cooperation constitutes a challenge in clinical routine. Using an Ingenuity TF PET/MR we investigated the impact of reduced acquisition time on lesion detectability, SUV and SNR measurements.

Methods A retrospective reconstruction of listmode PET data (370MBq of F18-FDG injected, acquisition one hour after injection) was performed on 7 patients with histologically proven HN squamous-cell carcinoma (lesion size : 1 to 3 cm) and with neck dissection performed for cervical lymph node metastases (lesion size : 0.3 to 2.1 cm). The initial acquisition protocol was 6 min/bed in the HN area. Reconstructions were performed with 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1.5 min by clipping the listmode data. The relaxation parameters were adapted in order to keep a similar signal-to-noise ratio between reconstructions. Mean and maximum SUV as well as SNR were measured for each patient in the following areas: lung, cerebellum, cervical muscles, tumor site and lymph nodes.

Results SUVmean, SUVmax and SNR were not significantly different for all acquisition times except for the SNR of muscle which was significantly decreased for 1.5 min compared to 6 min. Lesions were noticeable on all the reconstructions. All positive lymph nodes on pathology reports detected on the 6min reconstruction (down to 6 mm) were still visible on the 2 min reconstruction but lymph nodes smaller than 7 mm were missed in 1.5 min reconstruction.

Conclusions Our preliminary data suggest that in HN squamous cell carcinoma it is possible to reduce the PET acquisition time to 2 min without affecting sensitivity and specificity for lesion detection.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue supplement 2
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimization of PET acquisition and reconstruction for head and neck PET/MRI
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Optimization of PET acquisition and reconstruction for head and neck PET/MRI
Benedicte Delattre, Arthur Varoquaux, Olivier Rager, Antonis Kalemis, Osman Ratib, Minerva Becker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1522;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimization of PET acquisition and reconstruction for head and neck PET/MRI
Benedicte Delattre, Arthur Varoquaux, Olivier Rager, Antonis Kalemis, Osman Ratib, Minerva Becker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2013, 54 (supplement 2) 1522;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • The prognostic significance of SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT in early-staged non-small cell lung cancer after SBRT: a meta-analysis
  • F-18 FDG PET/CT evaluation of treatment response to ipilimumab therapy in advanced stage melanoma
  • Analytics in predicting progression-free survival and distant metastasis after chemoradiotherapy using spatial-temporal FDG-PET/CT features
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

MTA I: Head & Neck Posters

  • FDG PET/CT within 10 days after induction chemotherapy could predict CCRT response in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A preliminary study
  • Is 18F-FDG PET/CT more reliable than 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
  • PERCIST1.0 and RECIST1.1 in evaluating treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in primary and metastatic lymph node lesions of hypopharyngeal carcinoma
Show more MTA I: Head & Neck Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire