Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Diagnosis

18F FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Christopher Takehana, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir and Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 559;
Christopher Takehana
1Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Mittra
1Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Quon
1Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjiv Gambhir
1Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Iagaru
1Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

559

Objectives Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare but serious complication in transplant patients. While 18F FDG PET/CT has been used for the evaluation of patients with PTLD, its utility has yet to been proven. We were therefore prompted to review our experience with 18F FDG PET/CT in PTLD.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 28 consecutive patients who had undergone 18F FDG PET/CT imaging for PTLD from 1/2004 to 7/2011 at our isntitution. 18F FDG PET/CT findings were compared to other imaging modalities performed concurrently and a chart review of pertinent information was performed.

Results There were 14 women and 14 men, 2-70 year-old (average: 23.5 years). 23 had biopsy proven PTLD; 2 were treated as having disease due to positive 18F FDG PET/CT findings despite lack of biopsy proof; and 3 had PTLD excluded due to negative 18F FDG PET/CT findings. 84% of the patients with PTLD had extra-nodal involvement. In 70% of the cases, PET/CT detected occult or suggested malignancy in lesions equivocal on other scans. Furthermore, the more aggressive PTLD subtype had significantly higher SUVmax values compared to the less aggressive forms, 11.2 ± 7.8 versus 4.5 ± 3.2 respectively (P: 0.004).

Conclusions Our study suggests that 18F FDG PET/CT is beneficial in the management of patients with PTLD as both nodal and extra-nodal lesions demonstrated intense 18F FDG uptake. A potential benefit of 18F FDG PET/CT is its ability to detect occult lesions not visualized on other imaging modalities, particularly extra-nodal lesions. In addition, 18F FDG PET/CT may identify PTLD subtypes, as the more aggressive subtype cases presented with extra-nodal disease and had higher SUVmax values compared to the less aggressive ones

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Christopher Takehana, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 559;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Christopher Takehana, Erik Mittra, Andrew Quon, Sanjiv Gambhir, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 559;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

  • The 18F-FDG PET/CT is helpful in determining the cause and extent of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
  • Imaging patients with breast and prostate cancers using combined 18F NaF/18F FDG and TOF simultaneous PET/ MRI
  • 3D Volumetric lymph node assessment based on CT versus PSMA-PET/CT in recurrent prostate cancer
Show more Oncology: Clinical Diagnosis

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

  • Interest of 18 FDG-PET to confirm complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy in paediatric Burkitt’s lymphomas (BL)
  • Contrast enhanced (ce) CT in staging and end-of-treatment evaluation in lymphoma in the FDG PET/CT era: A need or a habit?
Show more Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire