Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Evaluation of the accuracy of PET lung images when uniform attenuation within the lungs is assumed

Mark Madsen and John Sunderland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 315;
Mark Madsen
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Sunderland
1Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

315

Objectives Whole body PET MRI systems require the generation of approximate attenuation maps which may be problematic in the thorax. The aim of this study was to investigate the errors associated with using an assumed constant lung attenuation coefficient for correcting PET studies.

Methods Nine clinical PET CT studies were used as mathematical phantoms. Emission projections were generated from the clinical PET studies and attenuation factors were generated and applied to the emission projections from the corresponding CT images ranging from the lung apices to the dome of the liver. In each of the CT slices, the lung attenuation coefficients were sampled and replaced with the slice-specific calculated mean lung attenuation coefficient as might be done for an attenuation map generated from MRI data.. The attenuation factors from these altered images were applied to the attenuated emission projections. Both the true emission projection set with the CT-based attenuation values and the emission set with the approximate attenuation correction were reconstructed with filtered backprojection. The resulting reconstructed images from these two sets were compared.

Results On average, 70 slices through the lung fields for each of the 9 studies were compared. The mean lung attenuation coefficient was 0.024/cm +/- 0.014/cm (58%). There were significant differences in the reconstructed PET lung values when the mean lung attenuation factor was used in the correction with errors ranging from -52% to +69% with similar behavior in every slice.

Conclusions Because of the large variability of lung attenuation coefficients both within and among individuals, using a single lung attenuation coefficient will result in large errors within the lung fields in PET imaging. This could limit the usefulness of PET MRI when the accuracy of PET lung values is important

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the accuracy of PET lung images when uniform attenuation within the lungs is assumed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the accuracy of PET lung images when uniform attenuation within the lungs is assumed
Mark Madsen, John Sunderland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 315;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the accuracy of PET lung images when uniform attenuation within the lungs is assumed
Mark Madsen, John Sunderland
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 315;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Image Generation: PET

  • Impact of 90Y-PET reconstruction parameters on dose volume histograms in post-implantation dosimetry of selective intravascular radionuclide therapy (SIRT)
  • Contribution of the modeling of point spread function and time-of-flight technology on the image quality of a PET/CT system
  • Quantitative 124I-PET in the presence of high 131I-activities
Show more Image Generation: PET

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire