Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis

Method and impact of attenuation correction on quantitative accuracy for the PET/X breast imaging scanner

Paul Kinahan, Larry Pierce, Kalpana Kanal and Lawrence Macdonald
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 314;
Paul Kinahan
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry Pierce
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kalpana Kanal
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence Macdonald
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

314

Objectives We are constructing a dual-modality PET/mammography scanner (the PET/X) for dedicated breast imaging. For quantitative imaging, e.g. to assess response to therapy, a method is needed to estimate attenuation and scatter.

Methods We have developed a method for estimating the necessary attenuation image from a single-view mammogram. The method is based on the constraints that biological breast materials have essentially identical attenuation coefficients at 511 keV. In other words, only the boundaries of the breast being imaged are needed, which can be estimated from the mammography image and the known separation between compression surfaces. Second-order corrections are available for the imaging geometry of the mammogram scanner, the compression paddle distortion, the variable thickness at the edge of the breast, and implants. We used simulations to evaluate the impact of attenuation correction as a function of location in the compressed breast and for different breast thicknesses of 3, 5, 7, and 9 cm.

Results With attenuation correction the correct PET image values were recovered independent of location in the breast and breast thickness. Without attenuation correction, there were large variations in the estimated PET value, decreasing by 50% or more from the edge to the center of the compressed breast. These errors and variations in errors increase with increasing breast thicknesses under compression.

Conclusions Accurate attenuation correction is feasible on a dual modality PET/mammography scanner. Breast shape and thus attenuation at 511 keV can be estimated from a mammography image and the known separation between detectors. For the geometry of the PET/X scanner, not performing attenuation correction induces errors of 50% or more that are dependent on breast thickness and location in the breast. Thus accurate attenuation correction is needed for quantitatively accurate PET breast images.

Research Support Supported by The UW/Coulter Translational Research Partnership Program, and the University of Washington C4C-CGF fund

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Method and impact of attenuation correction on quantitative accuracy for the PET/X breast imaging scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Method and impact of attenuation correction on quantitative accuracy for the PET/X breast imaging scanner
Paul Kinahan, Larry Pierce, Kalpana Kanal, Lawrence Macdonald
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 314;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Method and impact of attenuation correction on quantitative accuracy for the PET/X breast imaging scanner
Paul Kinahan, Larry Pierce, Kalpana Kanal, Lawrence Macdonald
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 314;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis

  • Exploring the impact of feature selection methods and classification algorithms on the predictive performance of PET radiomic ML models in lung cancer
  • Accuracy of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT absorbed dose estimation by reducing the imaging points
  • Assessment of AI-Enhanced Quantitative Volumetric MRI with Semi-Quantitative Analysis in 18F-FDG Metabolic Imaging for Alzheimer's Diagnosis.
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis

Image Generation: PET

  • Impact of 90Y-PET reconstruction parameters on dose volume histograms in post-implantation dosimetry of selective intravascular radionuclide therapy (SIRT)
  • Contribution of the modeling of point spread function and time-of-flight technology on the image quality of a PET/CT system
  • Quantitative 124I-PET in the presence of high 131I-activities
Show more Image Generation: PET

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire