Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportTechnologist

Different techniques of administering FDG for clinical PET imaging

Martin Schmitt, Renee Burney, Scott Stringer, Jennifer Frye and Janis Brule
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2609;
Martin Schmitt
1PET, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renee Burney
1PET, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Stringer
1PET, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Frye
2Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janis Brule
1PET, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

2609

Objectives To administer FDG to patients undergoing clinical PET exams in such a way that is appropriate to the patient and does not negatively impact the overall quality of the study.

Methods In our years of acquiring PET studies we have found that the administration of FDG must sometimes be altered to accomodate patient situations. Each of the unique situations comes with its own set of problems, and artifacts which must be taken into consideration before deciding to use that technique. The most common and accepted way of administering FDG is intravenously through a patent established upper extremity arm vein. This involves an i.v. established with normal saline running for 5-10 minutes before the injection of FDG. Alternative methods we use include a temporary small gauge butterfly needle, administration of FDG through an indwelling catheter (Port, Hickman etc) and oral administration of FDG.

Results The following problems and possible artificats should be taken into consideration for each of the our techniques: Standard i.v.: infiltrated dose which can affect SUV values and injection site in the field of view resulting in a hot spot on the images. Temporary butterfly injection: infiltrated dose, tracking or sticking of the FDG in the superficial vein often caused by not being able to follow injection with significant flush, size of the vein and poor circulation. Indwelling catheters: FDG adhering to the catheter, introduction of clots at time of injection, and infiltrated dose. Oral administration of FDG changes the biodistribution pattern of the FDG, SUV values for this adminstration technique are not established, care should be taken to avoid this technique in known or suspected cases of head and neck, abdominal and pelvic disease.

Conclusions Having multiple techniques available for the administration of FDG can allow a site to tailor the study to the patient's needs and still provide a high quality, diagnostic exam to the referring physicain

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 53, Issue supplement 1
May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Different techniques of administering FDG for clinical PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Different techniques of administering FDG for clinical PET imaging
Martin Schmitt, Renee Burney, Scott Stringer, Jennifer Frye, Janis Brule
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2609;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Different techniques of administering FDG for clinical PET imaging
Martin Schmitt, Renee Burney, Scott Stringer, Jennifer Frye, Janis Brule
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2012, 53 (supplement 1) 2609;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Technologist

  • Comparison images between PET and SPECT of 90Y: A Monte-Carlo simulation study
  • Predictors of pre-ablation I-123 neck uptake measurements in post thyroidectomy patients
  • Variation of the PET count in relation to the alignment of the 18F point source on PET images
Show more Technologist

Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

  • Routine PET/CT Workflow Efficiency and Scan Time Improvements Using Continuous Bed Motion (CBM) Techniques
  • Reducing SUV of the bladder in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging using furosemide
  • [18F]Fluoride radiolabelling and stability of B-F…P pincer triphenylphosphonium derivatives for applications in mitochondrial imaging.
Show more Technologist Meet the Author Poster Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire